- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Hollocher, H.
- Articles by Wu, C. I.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Hollocher, H.
- Articles by Wu, C. I.
Genetics, Vol 143, 1243-1255, Copyright © 1996
INVESTIGATIONS |
The Genetics of Reproductive Isolation in the Drosophila simulans Clade: X vs. Autosomal Effects and Male vs. Female Effects
H. Hollocher and C. I. Wu
Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544
A strong effect of homozygous autosomal regions on reproductive isolation was found for crosses between the species in the Drosophila simulans clade. Second chromosome regions were introgressed from D. mauritiana and D. sechellia into D. simulans and tested for their homozygous effects on hybrid male and hybrid female sterility and inviability. Most introgressions are fertile as heterozygotes, yet produce sterile male offspring when made homozygous. The density of homozygous autosomal factors contributing to hybrid male sterility is comparable to the density of X chromosome factors for this level of resolution. Female sterility was also revealed, yet the disparity between male and female levels of sterility was great, with male sterility being up to 23 times greater than female sterility. Complete hybrid inviability was also associated with some regions of the second chromosome, yet there were no strong sex differences. In conclusion, we find no evidence to support a strong X chromosome bias in the evolution of hybrid sterility or inviability but do find a very strong sex bias in the evolution of hybrid sterility. In light of these findings, we reevaluate the current models proposed to explain the genetic pattern of reproductive isolation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. J. Moehring, A. Llopart, S. Elwyn, J. A. Coyne, and T. F. C. Mackay The Genetic Basis of Postzygotic Reproductive Isolation Between Drosophila santomea and D. yakuba Due to Hybrid Male Sterility Genetics, May 1, 2006; 173(1): 225 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Sweigart, L. Fishman, and J. H. Willis A Simple Genetic Incompatibility Causes Hybrid Male Sterility in Mimulus Genetics, April 1, 2006; 172(4): 2465 - 2479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. C. Moyle and E. B. Graham Genetics of Hybrid Incompatibility Between Lycopersicon esculentum and L. hirsutum Genetics, January 1, 2005; 169(1): 355 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sun, C.-T. Ting, and C.-I Wu The Normal Function of a Speciation Gene, Odysseus, and Its Hybrid Sterility Effect Science, July 2, 2004; 305(5680): 81 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Slotman, A. della Torre, and J. R. Powell The Genetics of Inviability and Male Sterility in Hybrids Between Anopheles gambiae and An. arabiensis Genetics, May 1, 2004; 167(1): 275 - 287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Tao, S. Chen, D. L. Hartl, and C. C. Laurie Genetic Dissection of Hybrid Incompatibilities Between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. I. Differential Accumulation of Hybrid Male Sterility Effects on the X and Autosomes Genetics, August 1, 2003; 164(4): 1383 - 1397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Tao, Z.-B. Zeng, J. Li, D. L. Hartl, and C. C. Laurie Genetic Dissection of Hybrid Incompatibilities Between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. II. Mapping Hybrid Male Sterility Loci on the Third Chromosome Genetics, August 1, 2003; 164(4): 1399 - 1418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Presgraves A Fine-Scale Genetic Analysis of Hybrid Incompatibilities in Drosophila Genetics, March 1, 2003; 163(3): 955 - 972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Barbash and M. Ashburner A Novel System of Fertility Rescue in Drosophila Hybrids Reveals a Link Between Hybrid Lethality and Female Sterility Genetics, January 1, 2003; 163(1): 217 - 226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Naisbit, C. D. Jiggins, M. Linares, C. Salazar, and J. Mallet Hybrid Sterility, Haldane's Rule and Speciation in Heliconius cydno and H. melpomene Genetics, August 1, 2002; 161(4): 1517 - 1526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Johnson Sixty Years After "Isolating Mechanisms, Evolution and Temperature": Muller's Legacy Genetics, July 1, 2002; 161(3): 939 - 944. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. F. Noor, K. L. Grams, L. A. Bertucci, and J. Reiland Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species PNAS, September 26, 2001; (2001) 221274498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Orr and S. Irving Complex Epistasis and the Genetic Basis of Hybrid Sterility in the Drosophila pseudoobscura Bogota-USA Hybridization Genetics, July 1, 2001; 158(3): 1089 - 1100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Turelli and H. A. Orr Dominance, Epistasis and the Genetics of Postzygotic Isolation Genetics, April 1, 2000; 154(4): 1663 - 1679. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Barbash, J. Roote, and M. Ashburner The Drosophila melanogaster Hybrid male rescue Gene Causes Inviability in Male and Female Species Hybrids Genetics, April 1, 2000; 154(4): 1747 - 1771. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Macdonald and D. B. Goldstein A Quantitative Genetic Analysis of Male Sexual Traits Distinguishing the Sibling Species Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia Genetics, December 1, 1999; 153(4): 1683 - 1699. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gadau, R. E. Page , Jr., and J. H. Werren Mapping of Hybrid Incompatibility Loci in Nasonia Genetics, December 1, 1999; 153(4): 1731 - 1741. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kirkpatrick and M. R. Servedio The Reinforcement of Mating Preferences on an Island Genetics, February 1, 1999; 151(2): 865 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Coyne, S. Simeonidis, and P. Rooney Relative Paucity of Genes Causing Inviability in Hybrids Between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans Genetics, November 1, 1998; 150(3): 1091 - 1103. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Presgraves and H. A. Orr Haldane's Rule in Taxa Lacking a Hemizygous X Science, October 30, 1998; 282(5390): 952 - 954. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
X. R. Maside, J. P. Barral, and H. F. Naveira Hidden Effects of X Chromosome Introgressions on Spermatogenesis in Drosophila simulans x D. mauritiana Hybrids Unveiled by Interactions Among Minor Genetic Factors Genetics, October 1, 1998; 150(2): 745 - 754. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. S. Takano Loss of Notum Macrochaetae as an Interspecific Hybrid Anomaly Between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans Genetics, July 1, 1998; 149(3): 1435 - 1450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Sawamura, A. W. Davis, and C.-I Wu Genetic analysis of speciation by means of introgression into Drosophila melanogaster PNAS, March 14, 2000; 97(6): 2652 - 2655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. F. Noor, K. L. Grams, L. A. Bertucci, and J. Reiland Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species PNAS, October 9, 2001; 98(21): 12084 - 12088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


