Genetics, Vol 143, 385-400, Copyright © 1996


INVESTIGATIONS

A Quantitative Measure of the Mitotic Pairing of Alleles in Drosophila melanogaster and the Influence of Structural Heterozygosity

M. M. Golic and K. G. Golic
Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112

In Drosophila there exist several examples of gene expression that can be modified by an interaction between alleles; this effect is known as transvection. The inference that alleles interact comes from the observations that homologous chromosomes pair in mitotically dividing cells, and that chromosome rearrangements can alter the phenotype produced by a pair of alleles. It is thought that heterozygous rearrangements impede the ability of alleles to pair and interact. However, because the existing data are inconsistent, this issue is not fully settled. By measuring the frequency of site-specific recombination between homologous chromosomes, we show that structural heterozygosity inhibits the pairing of alleles that lie distal to a rearrangement breakpoint. We suggest that some of the apparent conflicts may owe to variations in cell-cycle lengths in the tissues where the relevant allelic interactions occur. Cells with a longer cell cycle have more time to establish the normal pairing relationships that have been disturbed by rearrangements. In support, we show that Minute mutations, which slow the rate of cell division, partially restore a transvection effect that is disrupted by inversion heterozygosity.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
D. Gohl, M. Muller, V. Pirrotta, M. Affolter, and P. Schedl
Enhancer Blocking and Transvection at the Drosophila apterous Locus
Genetics, January 1, 2008; 178(1): 127 - 143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
B. R. Williams, J. R. Bateman, N. D. Novikov, and C.-T. Wu
Disruption of Topoisomerase II Perturbs Pairing in Drosophila Cell Culture
Genetics, September 1, 2007; 177(1): 31 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. Beumer, G. Bhattacharyya, M. Bibikova, J. K. Trautman, and D. Carroll
Efficient Gene Targeting in Drosophila With Zinc-Finger Nucleases
Genetics, April 1, 2006; 172(4): 2391 - 2403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. R. Morris, D. A. Petrov, A. M. Lee, and C.-t. Wu
Enhancer Choice in Cis and in Trans in Drosophila melanogaster: Role of the Promoter
Genetics, August 1, 2004; 167(4): 1739 - 1747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
Y. S. Rong and K. G. Golic
The Homologous Chromosome Is an Effective Template for the Repair of Mitotic DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Drosophila
Genetics, December 1, 2003; 165(4): 1831 - 1842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
W. J. Gong and K. G. Golic
Ends-out, or replacement, gene targeting in Drosophila
PNAS, March 4, 2003; 100(5): 2556 - 2561.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
Y. S. Rong, S. W. Titen, H. B. Xie, M. M. Golic, M. Bastiani, P. Bandyopadhyay, B. M. Olivera, M. Brodsky, G. M. Rubin, and K. G. Golic
Targeted mutagenesis by homologous recombination in D. melanogaster
Genes & Dev., June 15, 2002; 16(12): 1568 - 1581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. M. Coveny, T. Dray, and G. B. Gloor
The Effect of Heterologous Insertions on Gene Conversion in Mitotically Dividing Cells in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, May 1, 2002; 161(1): 249 - 258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J.-L. Chen, K. L. Huisinga, M. M. Viering, S. A. Ou, C.-t. Wu, and P. K. Geyer
Enhancer action in trans is permitted throughout the Drosophila genome
PNAS, March 19, 2002; 99(6): 3723 - 3728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
S. M. Burgess and N. Kleckner
Collisions between yeast chromosomal loci in vivo are governed by three layers of organization
Genes & Dev., July 15, 1999; 13(14): 1871 - 1883.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. Ahmad and K. G. Golic
Telomere Loss in Somatic Cells of Drosophila Causes Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis
Genetics, March 1, 1999; 151(3): 1041 - 1051.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Cell Biol.Home page
A. K. Csink and S. Henikoff
Large-scale Chromosomal Movements During Interphase Progression in Drosophila
J. Cell Biol., October 5, 1998; 143(1): 13 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. J. Beumer, S. Pimpinelli, and K. G. Golic
Induced Chromosomal Exchange Directs the Segregation of Recombinant Chromatids in Mitosis of Drosophila
Genetics, September 1, 1998; 150(1): 173 - 188.
[Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. S. Weiler and B. T. Wakimoto
Chromosome Rearrangements Induce Both Variegated and Reduced, Uniform Expression of Heterochromatic Genes in a Development-Specific Manner
Genetics, July 1, 1998; 149(3): 1451 - 1464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Biol.Home page
J. C. Fung, W. F. Marshall, A. Dernburg, D. A. Agard, and J. W. Sedat
Homologous Chromosome Pairing in Drosophila melanogaster Proceeds through Multiple Independent Initiations
J. Cell Biol., April 6, 1998; 141(1): 5 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. Ahmad and K. G. Golic
The Transmission of Fragmented Chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, February 1, 1998; 148(2): 775 - 792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
M. Gemkow, P. Verveer, and D. Arndt-Jovin
Homologous association of the Bithorax-Complex during embryogenesis: consequences for transvection in Drosophila melanogaster
Development, January 11, 1998; 125(22): 4541 - 4552.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
A Busturia, C. Wightman, and S Sakonju
A silencer is required for maintenance of transcriptional repression throughout Drosophila development
Development, January 11, 1997; 124(21): 4343 - 4350.
[Abstract] [PDF]