- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Golic, M. M.
- Articles by Golic, K. G.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Golic, M. M.
- Articles by Golic, K. G.
Genetics, Vol 143, 385-400, Copyright © 1996
INVESTIGATIONS |
A Quantitative Measure of the Mitotic Pairing of Alleles in Drosophila melanogaster and the Influence of Structural Heterozygosity
M. M. Golic and K. G. Golic
Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112
In Drosophila there exist several examples of gene expression that can be modified by an interaction between alleles; this effect is known as transvection. The inference that alleles interact comes from the observations that homologous chromosomes pair in mitotically dividing cells, and that chromosome rearrangements can alter the phenotype produced by a pair of alleles. It is thought that heterozygous rearrangements impede the ability of alleles to pair and interact. However, because the existing data are inconsistent, this issue is not fully settled. By measuring the frequency of site-specific recombination between homologous chromosomes, we show that structural heterozygosity inhibits the pairing of alleles that lie distal to a rearrangement breakpoint. We suggest that some of the apparent conflicts may owe to variations in cell-cycle lengths in the tissues where the relevant allelic interactions occur. Cells with a longer cell cycle have more time to establish the normal pairing relationships that have been disturbed by rearrangements. In support, we show that Minute mutations, which slow the rate of cell division, partially restore a transvection effect that is disrupted by inversion heterozygosity.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Gohl, M. Muller, V. Pirrotta, M. Affolter, and P. Schedl Enhancer Blocking and Transvection at the Drosophila apterous Locus Genetics, January 1, 2008; 178(1): 127 - 143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Williams, J. R. Bateman, N. D. Novikov, and C.-T. Wu Disruption of Topoisomerase II Perturbs Pairing in Drosophila Cell Culture Genetics, September 1, 2007; 177(1): 31 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Beumer, G. Bhattacharyya, M. Bibikova, J. K. Trautman, and D. Carroll Efficient Gene Targeting in Drosophila With Zinc-Finger Nucleases Genetics, April 1, 2006; 172(4): 2391 - 2403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Morris, D. A. Petrov, A. M. Lee, and C.-t. Wu Enhancer Choice in Cis and in Trans in Drosophila melanogaster: Role of the Promoter Genetics, August 1, 2004; 167(4): 1739 - 1747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. S. Rong and K. G. Golic The Homologous Chromosome Is an Effective Template for the Repair of Mitotic DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Drosophila Genetics, December 1, 2003; 165(4): 1831 - 1842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Gong and K. G. Golic Ends-out, or replacement, gene targeting in Drosophila PNAS, March 4, 2003; 100(5): 2556 - 2561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. S. Rong, S. W. Titen, H. B. Xie, M. M. Golic, M. Bastiani, P. Bandyopadhyay, B. M. Olivera, M. Brodsky, G. M. Rubin, and K. G. Golic Targeted mutagenesis by homologous recombination in D. melanogaster Genes & Dev., June 15, 2002; 16(12): 1568 - 1581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Coveny, T. Dray, and G. B. Gloor The Effect of Heterologous Insertions on Gene Conversion in Mitotically Dividing Cells in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, May 1, 2002; 161(1): 249 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-L. Chen, K. L. Huisinga, M. M. Viering, S. A. Ou, C.-t. Wu, and P. K. Geyer Enhancer action in trans is permitted throughout the Drosophila genome PNAS, March 19, 2002; 99(6): 3723 - 3728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Burgess and N. Kleckner Collisions between yeast chromosomal loci in vivo are governed by three layers of organization Genes & Dev., July 15, 1999; 13(14): 1871 - 1883. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ahmad and K. G. Golic Telomere Loss in Somatic Cells of Drosophila Causes Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis Genetics, March 1, 1999; 151(3): 1041 - 1051. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Csink and S. Henikoff Large-scale Chromosomal Movements During Interphase Progression in Drosophila J. Cell Biol., October 5, 1998; 143(1): 13 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Beumer, S. Pimpinelli, and K. G. Golic Induced Chromosomal Exchange Directs the Segregation of Recombinant Chromatids in Mitosis of Drosophila Genetics, September 1, 1998; 150(1): 173 - 188. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. S. Weiler and B. T. Wakimoto Chromosome Rearrangements Induce Both Variegated and Reduced, Uniform Expression of Heterochromatic Genes in a Development-Specific Manner Genetics, July 1, 1998; 149(3): 1451 - 1464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Fung, W. F. Marshall, A. Dernburg, D. A. Agard, and J. W. Sedat Homologous Chromosome Pairing in Drosophila melanogaster Proceeds through Multiple Independent Initiations J. Cell Biol., April 6, 1998; 141(1): 5 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ahmad and K. G. Golic The Transmission of Fragmented Chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, February 1, 1998; 148(2): 775 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gemkow, P. Verveer, and D. Arndt-Jovin Homologous association of the Bithorax-Complex during embryogenesis: consequences for transvection in Drosophila melanogaster Development, January 11, 1998; 125(22): 4541 - 4552. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Busturia, C. Wightman, and S Sakonju A silencer is required for maintenance of transcriptional repression throughout Drosophila development Development, January 11, 1997; 124(21): 4343 - 4350. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||




