- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Gustavson, E.
- Articles by Kornberg, T. B.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Gustavson, E.
- Articles by Kornberg, T. B.
Genetics, Vol 142, 893-906, Copyright © 1996
INVESTIGATIONS |
The Drosophila engrailed and invected Genes: Partners in Regulation, Expression and Function
E. Gustavson, A. S. Goldsborough, Z. Ali and T. B. Kornberg
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143
We isolated and characterized numerous engrailed and invected alleles. Among the deficiencies we isolated, a mutant lacking invected sequences was viable and phenotypically normal, a mutant lacking engrailed was an embryo lethal and had slight segmentation defects, and a mutant lacking both engrailed and invected was most severely affected. In seven engrailed alleles, mutations caused translation to terminate prematurely in the central or C-terminal portion of the coding sequence, resulting in embryonic lethality and segmentation defects. Both engrailed and invected expression declined prematurely in these mutant embryos. In wild-type embryos, engrailed and invected are juxtaposed and are expressed in essentially identical patterns. A breakpoint mutant that separates the engrailed and invected transcription units parceled different aspects of the expression pattern to engrailed or invected. We also found that both genes cause similar defects when expressed ectopically and that the protein products of both genes act to repress transcription in cultured cells. We propose that the varied phenotypes of the engrailed alleles can be explained by the differential effects these mutants have on the combination of engrailed and invected activities, that engrailed and invected share a regulatory region, and that they encode redundant functions.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. J. Casso, S. Liu, D. D. Iwaki, S. K. Ogden, and T. B. Kornberg A Screen for Modifiers of Hedgehog Signaling in Drosophila melanogaster Identifies swm and mts Genetics, March 1, 2008; 178(3): 1399 - 1413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. DeVido, D. Kwon, J. L. Brown, and J. A. Kassis The role of Polycomb-group response elements in regulation of engrailed transcription in Drosophila Development, February 15, 2008; 135(4): 669 - 676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Merabet, J. C.-G. Hombria, N. Hu, J. Pradel, and Y. Graba Hox-controlled reorganisation of intrasegmental patterning cues underlies Drosophila posterior spiracle organogenesis Development, July 1, 2005; 132(13): 3093 - 3102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Solano, B. Mugat, D. Martin, F. Girard, J.-M. Huibant, C. Ferraz, B. Jacq, J. Demaille, and F. Maschat Genome-wide identification of in vivo Drosophila Engrailed-binding DNA fragments and related target genes Development, April 1, 2003; 130(7): 1243 - 1254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Dufourcq, P. Chanal, S. Vicaire, E. Camut, S. Quintin, B. G. W. den Boer, J. M. Bosher, and M. Labouesse lir-2, lir-1 and lin-26 Encode a New Class of Zinc-Finger Proteins and Are Organized in Two Overlapping Operons Both in Caenorhabditis elegans and in Caenorhabditis briggsae Genetics, May 1, 1999; 152(1): 221 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F Maschat, N Serrano, N. Randsholt, and G Geraud engrailed and polyhomeotic interactions are required to maintain the A/P boundary of the Drosophila developing wing Development, January 8, 1998; 125(15): 2771 - 2780. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Blair and A Ralston Smoothened-mediated Hedgehog signalling is required for the maintenance of the anterior-posterior lineage restriction in the developing wing of Drosophila Development, January 10, 1997; 124(20): 4053 - 4063. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N Serrano, H. Brock, and F Maschat beta3-tubulin is directly repressed by the engrailed protein in Drosophila Development, January 7, 1997; 124(13): 2527 - 2536. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Bhat and P Schedl Requirement for engrailed and invected genes reveals novel regulatory interactions between engrailed/invected, patched, gooseberry and wingless during Drosophila neurogenesis Development, January 5, 1997; 124(9): 1675 - 1688. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Whiteley and J. Kassis Rescue of Drosophila engrailed mutants with a highly divergent mosquito engrailed cDNA using a homing, enhancer-trapping transposon Development, January 4, 1997; 124(8): 1531 - 1541. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. McDonald and C. Doe Establishing neuroblast-specific gene expression in the Drosophila CNS: huckebein is activated by Wingless and Hedgehog and repressed by Engrailed and Gooseberry Development, January 3, 1997; 124(5): 1079 - 1087. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N Azpiazu, P A Lawrence, J P Vincent, and M Frasch Segmentation and specification of the Drosophila mesoderm. Genes & Dev., December 15, 1996; 10(24): 3183 - 3194. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||


