- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Smith, J. M.
- Articles by Smith, N. H.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Smith, J. M.
- Articles by Smith, N. H.
Genetics, Vol 142, 1037-1043, Copyright © 1996
INVESTIGATIONS |
Site-Specific Codon Bias in Bacteria
J. M. Smith and N. H. Smith
School of Biological Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QG, United Kingdom
Sequences of the gapA and ompA genes from 10 genera of enterobacteria have been analyzed. There is strong bias in codon usage, but different synonymous codons are preferred at different sites in the same gene. Site-specific preference for unfavored codons is not confined to the first 100 codons and is usually manifest between two codons utilizing the same tRNA. Statistical analyses, based on conclusions reached in an accompanying paper, show that the use of an unfavored codon at a given site in different genera is not due to common descent and must therefore be caused either by sequence-specific mutation or sequence-specific selection. Reasons are given for thinking that sequence-specific mutation cannot be responsible. We are unable to explain the preference between synonymous codons ending in C or T, but synonymous choice between A and G at third sites is largely explained by avoidance of AG-G (where the hyphen indicates the boundary between codons). We also observed that the preferred codon for proline in Enterobacter cloacea has changed from CCG to CCA.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Stoletzki and A. Eyre-Walker Synonymous Codon Usage in Escherichia coli: Selection for Translational Accuracy Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2007; 24(2): 374 - 381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
