- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Barbash, D. A.
- Articles by Cline, T. W.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Barbash, D. A.
- Articles by Cline, T. W.
Genetics, Vol 141, 1451-1471, Copyright © 1995
INVESTIGATIONS |
Genetic and Molecular Analysis of the Autosomal Component of the Primary Sex Determination Signal of Drosophila melanogaster
D. A. Barbash and T. W. Cline
Division of Genetics, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3204
Drosophila sex is determined by the action of the X:A chromosome balance on transcription of Sex-lethal (Sxl), a feminizing switch gene. We obtained loss-of-function mutations in denominator elements of the X:A signal by selecting for dominant suppressors of a female-specific lethal mutation in the numerator element, sisterlessA (sisA). Ten suppressors were recovered in this extensive genome-wide selection. All were mutations in deadpan (dpn), a pleiotropic locus previously discovered to be a denominator element. Detailed genetic and molecular characterization is presented of this diverse set of new dpn alleles including their effects on Sxl. Although selected only for impairment of sex-specific functions, all were also impaired in nonsex-specific functions. Male-lethal effects were anticipated for mutations in a major denominator element, but we found that viability of males lacking dpn function was reduced no more than 50% relative to their dpn(-) sisters. Moreover, loss of dpn activity in males caused only a modest derepression of the Sxl ``establishment'' promoter (Sxl(Pe)), the X:A target. By itself, dpn cannot account for the masculinizing effect of increased autosomal ploidy, the effect that gave rise to the concept of the X:A ratio; nevertheless, if there are other denominator elements, our results suggest that their individual contributions to the sex-determination signal are even less than that of dpn. The time course of expression of dpn and of Sxl in dpn mutant backgrounds suggests that dpn is required for sex determination only during the later stages of X:A signaling in males to prevent inappropriate expression of Sxl(Pe) in the face of increasing sis gene product levels.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. R. t. Bosch, J. A. Benavides, and T. W. Cline The TAGteam DNA motif controls the timing of Drosophila pre-blastoderm transcription Development, May 15, 2006; 133(10): 1967 - 1977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Wrischnik, J. R. Timmer, L. A. Megna, and T. W. Cline Recruitment of the Proneural Gene scute to the Drosophila Sex-Determination Pathway Genetics, December 1, 2003; 165(4): 2007 - 2027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Louis, L. Holm, L. Sanchez, and M. Kaufman A Theoretical Model for the Regulation of Sex-lethal, a Gene That Controls Sex Determination and Dosage Compensation in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, November 1, 2003; 165(3): 1355 - 1384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Yang, H. Lu, Y. Hong, T. M. Jinks, P. A. Estes, and J. W. Erickson Interpretation of X Chromosome Dose at Sex-lethal Requires Non-E-Box Sites for the Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Proteins SISB and Daughterless Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2001; 21(5): 1581 - 1592. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Waterbury, J. I. Horabin, D. Bopp, and P. Schedl Sex Determination in the Drosophila Germline Is Dictated by the Sexual Identity of the Surrounding Soma Genetics, August 1, 2000; 155(4): 1741 - 1756. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C Schutt and R Nothiger Structure, function and evolution of sex-determining systems in Dipteran insects Development, January 2, 2000; 127(4): 667 - 677. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Cline, D. Z. Rudner, D. A. Barbash, M. Bell, and R. Vutien Inaugural Article: Functioning of the Drosophila integral U1/U2 protein Snf independent of U1 and U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles is revealed by snf+ gene dose effects PNAS, December 7, 1999; 96(25): 14451 - 14458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Jimenez, C. P. Verrijzer, and D. Ish-Horowicz A Conserved Motif in Goosecoid Mediates Groucho-Dependent Repression in Drosophila Embryos Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 1999; 19(3): 2080 - 2087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhang and M. Levine Groucho and dCtBP mediate separate pathways of transcriptional repression in the Drosophila embryo PNAS, January 19, 1999; 96(2): 535 - 540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Erickson and T. Cline Key aspects of the primary sex determination mechanism are conserved across the genus Drosophila Development, January 8, 1998; 125(16): 3259 - 3268. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Jimenez, Z.'e. Paroush, and D. Ish-Horowicz Groucho acts as a corepressor for a subset of negative regulators, including Hairy and Engrailed Genes & Dev., November 15, 1997; 11(22): 3072 - 3082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Franke, A Dernburg, G. Bashaw, and B. Baker Evidence that MSL-mediated dosage compensation in Drosophila begins at blastoderm Development, January 9, 1996; 122(9): 2751 - 2760. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||




