- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Loidl, J.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Loidl, J.
Genetics, Vol 139, 1511-1520, Copyright © 1995
INVESTIGATIONS |
Meiotic Chromosome Pairing in Triploid and Tetraploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae
J. Loidl
Institute of Botany, University of Vienna, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
Meiotic chromosome pairing in isogenic triploid and tetraploid strains of yeast and the consequences of polyploidy on meiotic chromosome segregation are studied. Synaptonemal complex formation at pachytene was found to be different in the triploid and in the tetraploid. In the triploid, triple-synapsis, that is, the connection of three homologues at a given site, is common. It can even extend all the way along the chromosomes. In the tetraploid, homologous chromosomes mostly come in pairs of synapsed bivalents. Multiple synapsis, that is, synapsis of more than two homologues in one and the same region, was virtually absent in the tetraploid. About five quadrivalents per cell occurred due to the switching of pairing partners. From the frequency of pairing partner switches it can be deduced that in most chromosomes synapsis is initiated primarily at one end, occasionally at both ends and rarely at an additional intercalary position. In contrast to a considerably reduced spore viability (~40%) in the triploid, spore viability is only mildly affected in the tetraploid. The good spore viability is presumably due to the low frequency of quadrivalents and to the highly regular 2:2 segregation of the few quadrivalents that do occur. Occasionally, however, quadrivalents appear to be subject to 3:1 nondisjunction that leads to spore death in the second generation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Q.-F. Chen, S. L. K. Hsam, and F. J. Zeller Cytogenetic Studies on Diploid and Autotetraploid Common Buckwheat and Their Autotriploid and Trisomics Crop Sci., November 7, 2007; 47(6): 2340 - 2345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. K. Ezov, E. Boger-Nadjar, Z. Frenkel, I. Katsperovski, S. Kemeny, E. Nevo, A. Korol, and Y. Kashi Molecular-Genetic Biodiversity in a Natural Population of the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae From "Evolution Canyon": Microsatellite Polymorphism, Ploidy and Controversial Sexual Status Genetics, November 1, 2006; 174(3): 1455 - 1468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Lorenz, J. Fuchs, R. Burger, and J. Loidl Chromosome Pairing Does Not Contribute to Nuclear Architecture in Vegetative Yeast Cells Eukaryot. Cell, October 1, 2003; 2(5): 856 - 866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Trelles-Sticken, J. Loidl, and H. Scherthan Increased ploidy and KAR3 and SIR3 disruption alter the dynamics of meiotic chromosomes and telomeres J. Cell Sci., June 15, 2003; 116(12): 2431 - 2442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Lee, L. Neigeborn, and R. J. Kaufman The Unfolded Protein Response Is Required for Haploid Tolerance in Yeast J. Biol. Chem., March 28, 2003; 278(14): 11818 - 11827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Greig, E. J. Louis, R. H. Borts, and M. Travisano Hybrid Speciation in Experimental Populations of Yeast Science, November 29, 2002; 298(5599): 1773 - 1775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P R Chua and G S Roeder Tam1, a telomere-associated meiotic protein, functions in chromosome synapsis and crossover interference. Genes & Dev., July 15, 1997; 11(14): 1786 - 1800. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B Rockmill, M Sym, H Scherthan, and G S Roeder Roles for two RecA homologs in promoting meiotic chromosome synapsis. Genes & Dev., November 1, 1995; 9(21): 2684 - 2695. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||






