- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Orr, H. A.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Orr, H. A.
Genetics, Vol 139, 1441-1447, Copyright © 1995
INVESTIGATIONS |
Somatic Mutation Favors the Evolution of Diploidy
H. A. Orr
Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627
Explanations of diploidy have focused on advantages gained from masking deleterious mutations that are inherited. Recent theory has shown that these explanations are flawed. Indeed, we still lack any satisfactory explanation of diploidy in species that are asexual or that recombine only rarely. Here I consider a possibility first suggested by EFROIMSON in 1932, by MULLER in 1964 and by CROW and KIMURA in 1965: diploidy may provide protection against somatic, not inherited, mutations. I both compare the mean fitness of haploid and diploid populations that are asexual and investigate the invasion of ``diploidy'' alleles in sexual populations. When deleterious mutations are partially recessive and somatic mutation is sufficiently common, somatic mutation provides a clear advantage to diploidy in both asexual and sexual species.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. R. Weeks, F. Marec, and J. A. J. Breeuwer A Mite Species That Consists Entirely of Haploid Females Science, June 29, 2001; 292(5526): 2479 - 2482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Drake, B. Charlesworth, D. Charlesworth, and J. F. Crow Rates of Spontaneous Mutation Genetics, April 1, 1998; 148(4): 1667 - 1686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

