- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Latter, BDH.
- Articles by Pascoe, L.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Latter, BDH.
- Articles by Pascoe, L.
Genetics, Vol 139, 287-297, Copyright © 1995
INVESTIGATIONS |
Reduced Genetic Load Revealed by Slow Inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster
BDH. Latter, J. C. Mulley, D. Reid and L. Pascoe
School of Biological Sciences and Faculty of Agriculture, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
The rate of decline in reproductive fitness in populations of Drosophilia melanogaster inbred at an initial rate of ~1% per generation has been investigated under both competitive and noncompetitive conditions. Breeding population size was variable in the inbred lines with an estimated harmonic mean of 66.7 +/- 2.2. Of the 60 lines maintained without reserves, 75% survived a period of 210 generations of slow inbreeding and were then rapidly inbred by full-sib mating to near-homozygosity. The initial rate of inbreeding was estimated to be 0.96 +/- 0.16% per generation, corresponding to an effective population size of ~50. However, the rate of inbreeding declined significantly with time to average only 0.52 +/- 0.08% per generation over the 210 generation period, most likely due to associative overdominance built up by genetic sampling and selection in the small populations. The total inbreeding depression in fitness was estimated to be 87 +/- 3% for competitive ability and 27 +/- 5% for fitness under uncrowded conditions, corresponding to rates of decline of 2.0 +/- 0.3 and 0.32 +/- 0.07%, respectively, per 1% increase in the inbreeding coefficient. The frequency of lethal second chromosomes in the resultant near-homozygous lines was of the order of 5%, lethal free second chromosomes showed a mean viability under both crowded and uncrowded conditions of ~95%, and their population cage fitness was 60% that of Cy/+ heterozygotes. It can be concluded that homozygous genotypes from which deleterious genes of major effect have been eliminated during slow inbreeding may show far less depression in reproductive fitness than suggested by earlier studies of wild chromosome homozygotes. The loss in fitness due to homozygosity throughout the entire genome may be as little as 85-90% under competitive conditions, and 25-30% in an optimal environment.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. R. Swindell and J. L. Bouzat Inbreeding Depression and Male Survivorship in Drosophila: Implications for Senescence Theory Genetics, January 1, 2006; 172(1): 317 - 327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Fernandez, J. Rodriganez, M. A. Toro, M. C. Rodriguez, and L. Silio Inbreeding effects on the parameters of the growth function in three strains of Iberian pigs J Anim Sci, September 1, 2002; 80(9): 2267 - 2275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Bierne, A. Tsitrone, and P. David An Inbreeding Model of Associative Overdominance During a Population Bottleneck Genetics, August 1, 2000; 155(4): 1981 - 1990. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wang and W. G. Hill Effect of Selection Against Deleterious Mutations on the Decline in Heterozygosity at Neutral Loci in Closely Inbreeding Populations Genetics, November 1, 1999; 153(3): 1475 - 1489. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
I. J. Saccheri, I. J. Wilson, R. A. Nichols, M. W. Bruford, and P. M. Brakefield Inbreeding of Bottlenecked Butterfly Populations: Estimation Using the Likelihood of Changes in Marker Allele Frequencies Genetics, March 1, 1999; 151(3): 1053 - 1063. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Shaw, D. L. Byers, and F. H. Shaw Genetic Components of Variation in Nemophila menziesii Undergoing Inbreeding: Morphology and Flowering Time Genetics, December 1, 1998; 150(4): 1649 - 1661. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||

