- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Latter, BDH.
- Articles by Mulley, J. C.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Latter, BDH.
- Articles by Mulley, J. C.
Genetics, Vol 139, 255-266, Copyright © 1995
INVESTIGATIONS |
Genetic Adaptation to Captivity and Inbreeding Depression in Small Laboratory Populations of Drosophila melanogaster
BDH. Latter and J. C. Mulley
School of Biological Sciences and Faculty of Agriculture, University of Sydney, Australia
The rate of adaptation to a competitive laboratory environment and the associated inbreeding depression in measures of reproductive fitness have been observed in populations of Drosophila melanogaster with mean effective breeding size of the order of 50 individuals. Two large wild-derived populations and a long-established laboratory cage population were used as base stocks, from which subpopulations were extracted and slowly inbred under crowded conditions over a period of 210 generations. Comparisons have been made of the competitive ability and reproductive fitness of these subpopulations, the panmictic populations produced from them by hybridization and random mating and the wild- or cage-base populations from which they were derived. After an average of ~180 generations in the laboratory, the wild-derived panmictic populations exceeded the resampled natural populations by 75% in fitness under competitive conditions. The cage-derived panmictic population, after a total of 17 years in the laboratory, showed a 90% superiority in competitive ability over the corresponding wild population. In the inbred lines derived from the wild-base stocks, the average rate of adaptation was estimated to be 0.33 +/- 0.06% per generation. However, the gain in competitive ability was more than offset by inbreeding depression at an initial rate of ~2% per generation. The effects of both adaptation and inbreeding on reproductive ability in a noncompetitive environment were found to be minor by comparison. The maintenance of captive populations under noncompetitive conditions can therefore be expected to minimize adaptive changes due to natural selection in the changed environment.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Wang and W. G. Hill Effect of Selection Against Deleterious Mutations on the Decline in Heterozygosity at Neutral Loci in Closely Inbreeding Populations Genetics, November 1, 1999; 153(3): 1475 - 1489. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. H. Latter Mutant Alleles of Small Effect Are Primarily Responsible for the Loss of Fitness With Slow Inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, March 1, 1998; 148(3): 1143 - 1158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Fry, S. L. Heinsohn, and T. F. C. Mackay Heterosis for Viability, Fecundity, and Male Fertility in Drosophila melanogaster : Comparison of Mutational and Standing Variation Genetics, March 1, 1998; 148(3): 1171 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
