- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Carroll, D.
- Articles by Trautman, J. K.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Carroll, D.
- Articles by Trautman, J. K.
Genetics, Vol 138, 445-457, Copyright © 1994
INVESTIGATIONS |
Distribution of Exchanges Upon Homologous Recombination of Exogenous DNA in Xenopus laevis Oocytes
D. Carroll, C. W. Lehman, S. Jeong-Yu, P. Dohrmann, R. J. Dawson and J. K. Trautman
Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132
Homologous recombination between DNA molecules injected into Xenopus oocyte nuclei was investigated by examining the recovery of information from differentially marked parental sequences. The injected recombination substrate was a linear DNA with terminal direct repeats of 1246 bp; one repeat differed from the other by eight single base-pair substitutions, distributed throughout the region of homology, each of which created or destroyed a restriction enzyme site. Recombination products were recovered and analyzed for their content of the diagnostic sites, either directly by Southern blot-hybridization or after cloning in bacteria. The majority (76%) of the cloned products appeared to be the result of simple exchanges-i.e., there was one sharp transition from sequences derived from one parent to sequences derived from the other. These simple exchanges were concentrated near the ends of the homologous interval and, thus, near the sites of the original molecular ends. Placing marked sites on only one side of the homologous overlap showed that marker recovery was governed largely by the positions of the molecular ends and not by the markers themselves. When a terminal nonhomology was present at one end of the substrate, the yield of recombinants was sharply decreased, but the pattern of exchanges was not affected, suggesting that products from end-blocked substrates arise by the same recombination pathway. Because of considerable evidence supporting a nonconservative, resection-annealing mechanism for recombination in oocytes, we interpret the distribution of exchanges as resulting from long-patch repair of extensive heteroduplex intermediates.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Beumer, G. Bhattacharyya, M. Bibikova, J. K. Trautman, and D. Carroll Efficient Gene Targeting in Drosophila With Zinc-Finger Nucleases Genetics, April 1, 2006; 172(4): 2391 - 2403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Preston, W. Engels, and C. Flores Efficient Repair of DNA Breaks in Drosophila: Evidence for Single-Strand Annealing and Competition With Other Repair Pathways Genetics, June 1, 2002; 161(2): 711 - 720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Faruqi, H. J. Datta, D. Carroll, M. M. Seidman, and P. M. Glazer Triple-Helix Formation Induces Recombination in Mammalian Cells via a Nucleotide Excision Repair-Dependent Pathway Mol. Cell. Biol., February 1, 2000; 20(3): 990 - 1000. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. K. Lewis, J. W. Westmoreland, and M. A. Resnick Repair of Endonuclease-Induced Double-Strand Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Essential Role for Genes Associated with Nonhomologous End-Joining Genetics, August 1, 1999; 152(4): 1513 - 1529. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Bill, W. A. Duran, N. R. Miselis, and J. A. Nickoloff Efficient Repair of All Types of Single-Base Mismatches in Recombination Intermediates in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells: Competition Between Long-Patch and G-T Glycosylase-Mediated Repair of G-T Mismatches Genetics, August 1, 1998; 149(4): 1935 - 1943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Taghian, H. Hough, and J. A. Nickoloff Biased Short Tract Repair of Palindromic Loop Mismatches in Mammalian Cells Genetics, March 1, 1998; 148(3): 1257 - 1268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

