- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Palopoli, M. F.
- Articles by Wu, C. I.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Palopoli, M. F.
- Articles by Wu, C. I.
Genetics, Vol 138, 329-341, Copyright © 1994
INVESTIGATIONS |
Genetics of Hybrid Male Sterility Between Drosophila Sibling Species: A Complex Web of Epistasis Is Revealed in Interspecific Studies
M. F. Palopoli and C. I. Wu
Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
To study the genetic differences responsible for the sterility of their male hybrids, we introgressed small segments of an X chromosome from Drosophila simulans into a pure Drosophila mauritiana genetic background, then assessed the fertility of males carrying heterospecific introgressions of varying size. Although this analysis examined less than 20% of the X chromosome (roughly 5% of the euchromatic portion of the D. simulans genome), and the segments were introgressed in only one direction, a minimum of four factors that contribute to hybrid male sterility were revealed. At least two of the factors exhibited strong epistasis: males carrying either factor alone were consistently fertile, whereas males carrying both factors together were always sterile. Distinct spermatogenic phenotypes were observed for sterile introgressions of different lengths, and it appeared that an interaction between introgressed segments also influenced the stage of spermatogenic defect. Males with one category of introgression often produced large quantities of motile sperm and were observed copulating, but never inseminated females. Evidently these two species have diverged at a large number of loci which have varied effects on hybrid male fertility. By extrapolation, we estimate that there are at least 40 such loci on the X chromosome alone. Because these species exhibit little DNA-sequence divergence at arbitrarily chosen loci, it seems unlikely that the extensive functional divergence observed could be due mainly to random genetic drift. Significant epistasis between conspecific genes appears to be a common component of hybrid sterility between recently diverged species of Drosophila. The linkage relationships of interacting factors could shed light on the role played by epistatic selection in the dynamics of the allele substitutions responsible for reproductive barriers between species.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. A. Orr, J. Masly, and N. Phadnis Speciation in Drosophila: From Phenotypes to Molecules J. Hered., March 1, 2007; 98(2): 103 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Willett Deleterious Epistatic Interactions Between Electron Transport System Protein-Coding Loci in the Copepod Tigriopus californicus Genetics, July 1, 2006; 173(3): 1465 - 1477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Moehring, A. Llopart, S. Elwyn, J. A. Coyne, and T. F. C. Mackay The Genetic Basis of Postzygotic Reproductive Isolation Between Drosophila santomea and D. yakuba Due to Hybrid Male Sterility Genetics, May 1, 2006; 173(1): 225 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Kelly Epistasis in Monkeyflowers Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 1917 - 1931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Begun and H. A. Lindfors Rapid Evolution of Genomic Acp Complement in the melanogaster Subgroup of Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2005; 22(10): 2010 - 2021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Slotman, A. della Torre, and J. R. Powell The Genetics of Inviability and Male Sterility in Hybrids Between Anopheles gambiae and An. arabiensis Genetics, May 1, 2004; 167(1): 275 - 287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Barbash, D. F. Siino, A. M. Tarone, and J. Roote A rapidly evolving MYB-related protein causes species isolation in Drosophila PNAS, April 29, 2003; 100(9): 5302 - 5307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Johnson Sixty Years After "Isolating Mechanisms, Evolution and Temperature": Muller's Legacy Genetics, July 1, 2002; 161(3): 939 - 944. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. F. Noor, K. L. Grams, L. A. Bertucci, and J. Reiland Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species PNAS, September 26, 2001; (2001) 221274498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Orr and S. Irving Complex Epistasis and the Genetic Basis of Hybrid Sterility in the Drosophila pseudoobscura Bogota-USA Hybridization Genetics, July 1, 2001; 158(3): 1089 - 1100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Doi, M. Matsuda, M. Tomaru, H. Matsubayashi, and Y. Oguma A locus for female discrimination behavior causing sexual isolation in Drosophila PNAS, June 5, 2001; 98(12): 6714 - 6719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. L. Promislow, C. F. Jung, and M. L. Arnold Age-Specific Fitness Components in Hybrid Females of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis J. Hered., January 1, 2001; 92(1): 30 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Sucena and D. L. Stern Special Feature: Divergence of larval morphology between Drosophila sechellia and its sibling species caused by cis-regulatory evolution of ovo/shaven-baby PNAS, April 25, 2000; 97(9): 4530 - 4534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gadau, R. E. Page , Jr., and J. H. Werren Mapping of Hybrid Incompatibility Loci in Nasonia Genetics, December 1, 1999; 153(4): 1731 - 1741. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Weber, R. Eisman, L. Morey, A. Patty, J. Sparks, M. Tausek, and Z.-B. Zeng An Analysis of Polygenes Affecting Wing Shape on Chromosome 3 in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, October 1, 1999; 153(2): 773 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. H. Rieseberg, J. Whitton, and K. Gardner Hybrid Zones and the Genetic Architecture of a Barrier to Gene Flow Between Two Sunflower Species Genetics, June 1, 1999; 152(2): 713 - 727. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. Ting, S. Tsaur, M. Wu, and C. Wu A Rapidly Evolving Homeobox at the Site of a Hybrid Sterility Gene Science, November 20, 1998; 282(5393): 1501 - 1504. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
X. R. Maside, J. P. Barral, and H. F. Naveira Hidden Effects of X Chromosome Introgressions on Spermatogenesis in Drosophila simulans x D. mauritiana Hybrids Unveiled by Interactions Among Minor Genetic Factors Genetics, October 1, 1998; 150(2): 745 - 754. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Peixoto and J. C. Hall Analysis of Temperature-Sensitive Mutants Reveals New Genes Involved in the Courtship Song of Drosophila Genetics, February 1, 1998; 148(2): 827 - 838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Sawamura, A. W. Davis, and C.-I Wu Genetic analysis of speciation by means of introgression into Drosophila melanogaster PNAS, March 14, 2000; 97(6): 2652 - 2655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. F. Noor, K. L. Grams, L. A. Bertucci, and J. Reiland Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species PNAS, October 9, 2001; 98(21): 12084 - 12088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




