Genetics, Vol 136, 333-341, Copyright © 1994


INVESTIGATIONS

Possible Role of Natural Selection in the Formation of Tandem-Repetitive Noncoding DNA

W. Stephan and S. Cho
Department of Zoology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742

A simulation model of sequence-dependent amplification, unequal crossing over and mutation is analyzed. This model predicts the spontaneous formation of tandem-repetitive patterns of noncoding DNA from arbitrary sequences for a wide range of parameter values. Natural selection is found to play an essential role in this self-organizing process. Natural selection which is modeled as a mechanism for controlling the length of a nucleotide string but not the sequence itself favors the formation of tandem-repetitive structures. Two measures of sequence heterogeneity, inter-repeat variability and repeat length, are analyzed in detail. For fixed mutation rate, both inter-repeat variability and repeat length are found to increase with decreasing rates of (unequal) crossing over. The results are compared with data on micro-, mini- and satellite DNAs. The properties of minisatellites and satellite DNAs resemble the simulated structures very closely. This suggests that unequal crossing over is a dominant long-range ordering force which keeps these arrays homogeneous even in regions of very low recombination rates, such as at satellite DNA loci. Our analysis also indicates that in regions of low rates of (unequal) crossing over, inter-repeat variability is maintained at a low level at the expense of much larger repeat units (multimeric repeats), which are characteristic of satellite DNA. In contrast, the microsatellite data do not fit the proposed model well, suggesting that unequal crossing over does not act on these very short tandem arrays.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
D. Ames, N. Murphy, T. Helentjaris, N. Sun, and V. Chandler
Comparative Analyses of Human Single- and Multilocus Tandem Repeats
Genetics, July 1, 2008; 179(3): 1693 - 1704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
G. Bosco, P. Campbell, J. T. Leiva-Neto, and T. A. Markow
Analysis of Drosophila Species Genome Size and Satellite DNA Content Reveals Significant Differences Among Strains as Well as Between Species
Genetics, November 1, 2007; 177(3): 1277 - 1290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. Ciofi, G. A. Wilson, L. B. Beheregaray, C. Marquez, J. P. Gibbs, W. Tapia, H. L. Snell, A. Caccone, and J. R. Powell
Phylogeographic History and Gene Flow Among Giant Galapagos Tortoises on Southern Isabela Island
Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1727 - 1744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. Pons, E. Petitpierre, and C. Juan
Evolutionary Dynamics of Satellite DNA Family PIM357 in Species of the Genus Pimelia (Tenebrionidae, Coleoptera)
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2002; 19(8): 1329 - 1340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
L. Duret, G. Marais, and C. Biémont
Transposons but Not Retrotransposons Are Located Preferentially in Regions of High Recombination Rate in Caenorhabditis elegans
Genetics, December 1, 2000; 156(4): 1661 - 1669.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. R. D. Ganley and B. Scott
Extraordinary Ribosomal Spacer Length Heterogeneity in a Neotyphodium Endophyte Hybrid: Implications for Concerted Evolution
Genetics, December 1, 1998; 150(4): 1625 - 1637.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
D. Pilgrim
CeRep25B Forms Chromosome-Specific Minisatellite Arrays in Caenorhabditis elegans
Genome Res., November 1, 1998; 8(11): 1192 - 1201.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. N. Weitzmann, K. J. Woodford, and K. Usdin
DNA Secondary Structures and the Evolution of Hypervariable Tandem Arrays
J. Biol. Chem., April 4, 1997; 272(14): 9517 - 9523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]