- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Patterson, G. I.
- Articles by Chandler, V. L.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Patterson, G. I.
- Articles by Chandler, V. L.
Genetics, Vol 135, 881-894, Copyright © 1993
INVESTIGATIONS |
Paramutation, an Allelic Interaction, Is Associated With a Stable and Heritable Reduction of Transcription of the Maize b Regulatory Gene
G. I. Patterson, C. J. Thorpe and V. L. Chandler
Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403
The b gene of maize encodes a transcriptional activator of anthocyanin pigment biosynthetic genes. Certain b alleles undergo paramutation: a unidirectional, heritable alteration of one allele caused by the presence of another allele. B-I (intensely pigmented plant) is always changed to B' (weakly pigmented plant) in the B'/B-I heterozygote, such that all progeny receive the B' allele. The ``new'' B', which was B-I in the previous generation, is weakly pigmented and fully capable of changing another B-I allele into B'. It was not previously known whether paramutation is associated with altered b expression, altered B protein function or both. Our results show that B' acts in trans to suppress the transcription of B-I, with transcription remaining low in subsequent generations, even when the original B' allele segregates away. The products of B-I and B' are equally capable of activating the transcription of their target genes, indicating they are functionally equivalent. Genomic restriction maps, DNA sequence and methylation of B' and B-I were compared. Despite dramatic differences in phenotype and transcription of B' and B-I, no evidence for rearrangements, changes in sequence or changes in methylation was found. These results provide no support for models involving ``dominant negative'' proteins, gene conversion or transposable element interactions. We suggest that b paramutation involves a physical interaction between the alleles that suppresses transcription and promotes a change in chromatin structure that is heritable.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. M. McGinnis, C. Springer, Y. Lin, C. C. Carey, and V. Chandler Transcriptionally Silenced Transgenes in Maize Are Activated by Three Mutations Defective in Paramutation Genetics, July 1, 2006; 173(3): 1637 - 1647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. Rabinowicz, R. Citek, M. A. Budiman, A. Nunberg, J. A. Bedell, N. Lakey, A. L. O'Shaughnessy, L. U. Nascimento, W. R. McCombie, and R. A. Martienssen Differential methylation of genes and repeats in land plants Genome Res., October 1, 2005; 15(10): 1431 - 1440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Hollick, J. L. Kermicle, and S. E. Parkinson Rmr6 Maintains Meiotic Inheritance of Paramutant States in Zea mays Genetics, October 1, 2005; 171(2): 725 - 740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Della Vedova and K. C. Cone Paramutation: The Chromatin Connection PLANT CELL, June 1, 2004; 16(6): 1358 - 1364. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. Rabinowicz, L. E. Palmer, B. P. May, M. T. Hemann, S. W. Lowe, W. R. McCombie, and R. A. Martienssen Genes and Transposons Are Differentially Methylated in Plants, but Not in Mammals Genome Res., December 1, 2003; 13(12): 2658 - 2664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Stam, C. Belele, W. Ramakrishna, J. E. Dorweiler, J. L. Bennetzen, and V. L. Chandler The Regulatory Regions Required for B' Paramutation and Expression Are Located Far Upstream of the Maize b1 Transcribed Sequences Genetics, October 1, 2002; 162(2): 917 - 930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Stam, C. Belele, J. E. Dorweiler, and V. L. Chandler Differential chromatin structure within a tandem array 100 kb upstream of the maize b1 locus is associated with paramutation Genes & Dev., August 1, 2002; 16(15): 1906 - 1918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Stokes and E. J. Richards Induced instability of two Arabidopsis constitutive pathogen-response alleles PNAS, May 28, 2002; 99(11): 7792 - 7796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Lisch, C. C. Carey, J. E. Dorweiler, and V. L. Chandler A mutation that prevents paramutation in maize also reverses Mutator transposon methylation and silencing PNAS, April 30, 2002; 99(9): 6130 - 6135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Mallory, L. Ely, T. H. Smith, R. Marathe, R. Anandalakshmi, M. Fagard, H. Vaucheret, G. Pruss, L. Bowman, and V. B. Vance HC-Pro Suppression of Transgene Silencing Eliminates the Small RNAs but Not Transgene Methylation or the Mobile Signal PLANT CELL, March 1, 2001; 13(3): 571 - 583. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. V. Sidorenko and T. Peterson Transgene-Induced Silencing Identifies Sequences Involved in the Establishment of Paramutation of the Maize p1 Gene PLANT CELL, February 1, 2001; 13(2): 319 - 335. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Hollick and V. L. Chandler Genetic Factors Required to Maintain Repression of a Paramutagenic Maize pl1 Allele Genetics, January 1, 2001; 157(1): 369 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Dorweiler, C. C. Carey, K. M. Kubo, J. B. Hollick, J. L. Kermicle, and V. L. Chandler mediator of paramutation1 Is Required for Establishment and Maintenance of Paramutation at Multiple Maize Loci PLANT CELL, November 1, 2000; 12(11): 2101 - 2118. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Hollick, G. I. Patterson, I. M. Asmundsson, and V. L. Chandler Paramutation Alters Regulatory Control of the Maize pl Locus Genetics, April 1, 2000; 154(4): 1827 - 1838. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Selinger and V. L. Chandler Major recent and independent changes in levels and patterns of expression have occurred at the b gene, a regulatory locus in maize PNAS, December 21, 1999; 96(26): 15007 - 15012. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Panavas, J. Weir, and E. L. Walker The Structure and Paramutagenicity of the R-marbled Haplotype of Zea mays Genetics, October 1, 1999; 153(2): 979 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. K. Lloyd, D. A. Sinclair, and T. A. Grigliatti Genomic Imprinting and Position-Effect Variegation in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, April 1, 1999; 151(4): 1503 - 1516. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Jeddeloh, J. Bender, and E. J. Richards The DNA methylation locus DDM1 is required for maintenance of gene silencing in Arabidopsis Genes & Dev., June 1, 1998; 12(11): 1714 - 1725. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Epigenetic Instability and Trans-Silencing Interactions Associated With an SPT::Ac T-DNA Locus in Tobacco Genetics, January 1, 1998; 148(1): 457 - 470. |
||||
![]() |
D. Lisch, C. C. Carey, J. E. Dorweiler, and V. L. Chandler A mutation that prevents paramutation in maize also reverses Mutator transposon methylation and silencing PNAS, April 30, 2002; 99(9): 6130 - 6135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




