- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Dorsett, D.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Dorsett, D.
Genetics, Vol 134, 1135-1144, Copyright © 1993
INVESTIGATIONS |
Distance-Independent Inactivation of an Enhancer by the suppressor of Hairy-wing DNA-Binding Protein of Drosophila
D. Dorsett
Program in Molecular Biology, Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, and Cornell University Medical College Graduate Program in Molecular Biology, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10021
When the gypsy retrotransposon of Drosophila inserts between an enhancer and promoter it prevents the enhancer from activating transcription. Enhancers are blocked because the protein (SUHW) encoded by the suppressor of Hairy-wing [su(Hw)] gene binds to gypsy. For example, gypsy insertions in an 85 kilobase region between a wing margin-specific enhancer and the promoter in the cut gene cause a cut wing phenotype that is suppressed by su(Hw) mutations. A temperature-sensitive combination of mutant su(Hw) alleles was used to investigate the mechanism by which SUHW blocks the cut wing margin enhancer. By shifting from the nonpermissive to the permissive temperature and vice versa at various stages in development it was found that active SUHW is only required around pupariation when the wing margin enhancer is active to cause a cut wing phenotype. This was true whether gypsy was in the embryonic control region near the promoter, or in the late larval control region near the wing margin enhancer. These results indicate that SUHW must be active only when an enhancer is active to block the enhancer. Furthermore, the observations also indicate that enhancer-blocking by SUHW is reversible and that it occurs soon after binding of active SUHW to gypsy DNA. These results are consistent with models in which SUHW structurally interferes with enhancer-promoter interactions.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. Maksimenko, A. Golovnin, and P. Georgiev Enhancer-Promoter Communication Is Regulated by Insulator Pairing in a Drosophila Model Bigenic Locus Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2008; 28(17): 5469 - 5477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Cadieux, R. Harada, M. Paquet, O. Cote, M. Trudel, A. Nepveu, and M. Bouchard Polycystic Kidneys Caused by Sustained Expression of Cux1 Isoform p75 J. Biol. Chem., May 16, 2008; 283(20): 13817 - 13824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Lin, Q. Chen, L. Lin, S. Smith, and J. Zhou Promoter targeting sequence mediates enhancer interference in the Drosophila embryo PNAS, February 27, 2007; 104(9): 3237 - 3242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Sansregret, B. Goulet, R. Harada, B. Wilson, L. Leduy, J. Bertoglio, and A. Nepveu The p110 Isoform of the CDP/Cux Transcription Factor Accelerates Entry into S Phase. Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2006; 26(6): 2441 - 2455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Savitskaya, L. Melnikova, M. Kostuchenko, E. Kravchenko, E. Pomerantseva, T. Boikova, D. Chetverina, A. Parshikov, P. Zobacheva, E. Gracheva, et al. Study of Long-Distance Functional Interactions between Su(Hw) Insulators That Can Regulate Enhancer-Promoter Communication in Drosophila melanogaster Mol. Cell. Biol., February 1, 2006; 26(3): 754 - 761. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Dorsett, J. C. Eissenberg, Z. Misulovin, A. Martens, B. Redding, and K. McKim Effects of sister chromatid cohesion proteins on cut gene expression during wing development in Drosophila Development, November 1, 2005; 132(21): 4743 - 4753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Krupp, L. E. Yaich, R. J. Wessells, and R. Bodmer Identification of Genetic Loci That Interact With cut During Drosophila Wing-Margin Development Genetics, August 1, 2005; 170(4): 1775 - 1795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Weber, N. Johnson, D. Champlin, and A. Patty Many P-Element Insertions Affect Wing Shape in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, March 1, 2005; 169(3): 1461 - 1475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Lin, Q. Chen, L. Lin, and J. Zhou The Promoter Targeting Sequence mediates epigenetically heritable transcription memory Genes & Dev., November 1, 2004; 18(21): 2639 - 2651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Rollins, M. Korom, N. Aulner, A. Martens, and D. Dorsett Drosophila Nipped-B Protein Supports Sister Chromatid Cohesion and Opposes the Stromalin/Scc3 Cohesion Factor To Facilitate Long-Range Activation of the cut Gene Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2004; 24(8): 3100 - 3111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Truscott, L. Raynal, P. Premdas, B. Goulet, L. Leduy, G. Berube, and A. Nepveu CDP/Cux Stimulates Transcription from the DNA Polymerase {alpha} Gene Promoter Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2003; 23(8): 3013 - 3028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Lin, D. Wu, and J. Zhou The promoter targeting sequence facilitates and restricts a distant enhancer to a single promoter in the Drosophila embryo Development, February 1, 2003; 130(3): 519 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Goulet, P. Watson, M. Poirier, L. Leduy, G. Berube, S. Meterissian, P. Jolicoeur, and A. Nepveu Characterization of a Tissue-specific CDP/Cux Isoform, p75, Activated in Breast Tumor Cells Cancer Res., November 15, 2002; 62(22): 6625 - 6633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Wei and M. D. Brennan The gypsy Insulator Can Act as a Promoter-Specific Transcriptional Stimulator Mol. Cell. Biol., November 15, 2001; 21(22): 7714 - 7720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gause, P. Morcillo, and D. Dorsett Insulation of Enhancer-Promoter Communication by a Gypsy Transposon Insert in the Drosophila cut Gene: Cooperation between Suppressor of Hairy-wing and Modifier of mdg4 Proteins Mol. Cell. Biol., July 15, 2001; 21(14): 4807 - 4817. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Bell, A. G. West, and G. Felsenfeld Insulators and Boundaries: Versatile Regulatory Elements in the Eukaryotic Genome Science, January 19, 2001; 291(5503): 447 - 450. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. Nolo, L. A. Abbott, and H. J. Bellen Drosophila Lyra Mutations Are Gain-of-Function Mutations of senseless Genetics, January 1, 2001; 157(1): 307 - 315. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Vazquez and P. Schedl Deletion of an Insulator Element by the Mutation facet-strawberry in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, July 1, 2000; 155(3): 1297 - 1311. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Scott, A. D. Taubman, and P. K. Geyer Enhancer Blocking by the Drosophila gypsy Insulator Depends Upon Insulator Anatomy and Enhancer Strength Genetics, October 1, 1999; 153(2): 787 - 798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Rollins, P. Morcillo, and D. Dorsett Nipped-B, a Drosophila Homologue of Chromosomal Adherins, Participates in Activation by Remote Enhancers in the cut and Ultrabithorax Genes Genetics, June 1, 1999; 152(2): 577 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ohtsuki and M. Levine GAGA mediates the enhancer blocking activity of the eve promoter in the Drosophila embryo Genes & Dev., November 1, 1998; 12(21): 3325 - 3330. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ohtsuki, M. Levine, and H. N. Cai Different core promoters possess distinct regulatory activities in the Drosophila embryo Genes & Dev., February 15, 1998; 12(4): 547 - 556. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Polycomb Group Repression Is Blocked by the Drosophila suppressor of Hairy-wing [su(Hw)] Insulator Genetics, January 1, 1998; 148(1): 331 - 340. |
||||
![]() |
P. Morcillo, C. Rosen, M. K. Baylies, and D. Dorsett Chip, a widely expressed chromosomal protein required for segmentation and activity of a remote wing margin enhancer in Drosophila Genes & Dev., October 15, 1997; 11(20): 2729 - 2740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-F. Tsai, C.-C. Jang, G. G. Prikhod'ko, D. A. Bessarab, C.-Y. Tang, G. O. Pflugfelder, and Y. H. Sun Gypsy retrotransposon as a tool for the in vivo analysis of the regulatory region of the optomotor-blind gene in Drosophila PNAS, April 15, 1997; 94(8): 3837 - 3831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Micchelli, E. Rulifson, and S. Blair The function and regulation of cut expression on the wing margin of Drosophila: Notch, Wingless and a dominant negative role for Delta and Serrate Development, January 4, 1997; 124(8): 1485 - 1495. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Zhou, S Barolo, P Szymanski, and M Levine The Fab-7 element of the bithorax complex attenuates enhancer-promoter interactions in the Drosophila embryo. Genes & Dev., December 15, 1996; 10(24): 3195 - 3201. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Roseman, J. Swan, and P. Geyer A Drosophila insulator protein facilitates dosage compensation of the X chromosome min-white gene located at autosomal insertion sites Development, January 11, 1995; 121(11): 3573 - 3582. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Torigoi, I. M. Bennani-Baiti, C. Rosen, K. Gonzalez, P. Morcillo, M. Ptashne, and D. Dorsett Chip interacts with diverse homeodomain proteins and potentiates Bicoid activity in vivo PNAS, March 14, 2000; 97(6): 2686 - 2691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||







