- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Nagylaki, T.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Nagylaki, T.
Genetics, Vol 134, 627-647, Copyright © 1993
INVESTIGATIONS |
The Evolution of Multilocus Systems Under Weak Selection
T. Nagylaki
Department of Ecology and Evolution, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
The evolution of multilocus systems under weak selection is investigated. Generations are discrete and nonoverlapping; the monoecious population mates at random. The number of multiallelic loci, the linkage map, dominance, and epistasis are arbitrary. The genotypic fitnesses may depend on the gametic frequencies and time. The results hold for s << c(min), where s and c(min) denote the selection intensity and the smallest two-locus recombination frequency, respectively. After an evolutionarily short time of t(1) ~ (ln s)/ln(1 - c(min)) generations, all the multilocus linkage disequilibria are of the order of s [i.e., O(s) as s -> 0], and then the population evolves approximately as if it were in linkage equilibrium, the error in the gametic frequencies being O(s). Suppose the explicit time dependence (if any) of the genotypic fitnesses is O(s(2)). Then after a time t(2) ~ 2t(1), the linkage disequilibria are nearly constant, their rate of change being O(s(2)). Furthermore, with an error of O(s(2)), each linkage disequilibrium is proportional to the corresponding epistatic deviation for the interaction of additive effects on fitness. If the genotypic fitnesses change no faster than at the rate O(s(3)), then the single-generation change in the mean fitness is {Delta}W = W(-1)V(g) + O(s(3)), where V(g) designates the genic (or additive genetic) variance in fitness. The mean of a character with genotypic values whose single-generation change does not exceed O(s(2)) evolves at the rate {Delta}Z = W(-1)C(g) + O(s(2)), where C(g) represents the genic covariance of the character and fitness (i.e., the covariance of the average effect on the character and the average excess for fitness of every allele that affects the character). Thus, after a short time t(2), the absolute error in the fundamental and secondary theorems of natural selection is small, though the relative error may be large.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Labbe, N. Sidos, M. Raymond, and T. Lenormand Resistance Gene Replacement in the Mosquito Culex pipiens: Fitness Estimation From Long-Term Cline Series Genetics, May 1, 2009; 182(1): 303 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Neher and B. I. Shraiman Competition between recombination and epistasis can cause a transition from allele to genotype selection PNAS, April 21, 2009; 106(16): 6866 - 6871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Otto, M. R. Servedio, and S. L. Nuismer Frequency-Dependent Selection and the Evolution of Assortative Mating Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 2091 - 2112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Agrawal, L. Hadany, and S. P. Otto The Evolution of Plastic Recombination Genetics, October 1, 2005; 171(2): 803 - 812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Roze and T. Lenormand Self-Fertilization and the Evolution of Recombination Genetics, June 1, 2005; 170(2): 841 - 857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. H. Barton and S. P. Otto Evolution of Recombination Due to Random Drift Genetics, April 1, 2005; 169(4): 2353 - 2370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Nuismer and S. P. Otto Host-parasite interactions and the evolution of ploidy PNAS, July 27, 2004; 101(30): 11036 - 11039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kirkpatrick, T. Johnson, and N. Barton General Models of Multilocus Evolution Genetics, August 1, 2002; 161(4): 1727 - 1750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

