Genetics, Vol 134, 609-625, Copyright © 1993


INVESTIGATIONS

Pleiotropic Models of Polygenic Variation, Stabilizing Selection, and Epistasis

S. Gavrilets and G. de-Jong
N. I. Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, 117809 GSP-1, Moscow B-333, Russia, Laboratoire de Genetique Cellulaire, INRA Centre de Toulouse, Auzeville B. P. 27, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan, France Present address: Division of Environmental Studies, University of California, Davis, California 95616.

We show that in polymorphic populations many polygenic traits pleiotropically related to fitness are expected to be under apparent ``stabilizing selection'' independently of the real selection acting on the population. This occurs, for example, if the genetic system is at a stable polymorphic equilibrium determined by selection and the nonadditive contributions of the loci to the trait value either are absent, or are random and independent of those to fitness. Stabilizing selection is also observed if the polygenic system is at an equilibrium determined by a balance between selection and mutation (or migration) when both additive and nonadditive contributions of the loci to the trait value are random and independent of those to fitness. We also compare different viability models that can maintain genetic variability at many loci with respect to their ability to account for the strong stabilizing selection on an additive trait. Let V(m) be the genetic variance supplied by mutation (or migration) each generation, V(g) be the genotypic variance maintained in the population, and n be the number of the loci influencing fitness. We demonstrate that in mutation (migration)-selection balance models the strength of apparent stabilizing selection is order V(m)/V(g). In the overdominant model and in the symmetric viability model the strength of apparent stabilizing selection is approximately 1/(2n) that of total selection on the whole phenotype. We show that a selection system that involves pairwise additive by additive epistasis in maintaining variability can lead to a lower genetic load and genetic variance in fitness (approximately 1/(2n) times) than an equivalent selection system that involves overdominance. We show that, in the epistatic model, the apparent stabilizing selection on an additive trait can be as strong as the total selection on the whole phenotype.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
T. F. C. Mackay, R. F. Lyman, and F. Lawrence
Polygenic Mutation in Drosophila melanogaster: Mapping Spontaneous Mutations Affecting Sensory Bristle Number
Genetics, August 1, 2005; 170(4): 1723 - 1735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
X.-S. Zhang, J. Wang, and W. G. Hill
Redistribution of Gene Frequency and Changes of Genetic Variation Following a Bottleneck in Population Size
Genetics, July 1, 2004; 167(3): 1475 - 1492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
X.-S. Zhang and W. G. Hill
Joint Effects of Pleiotropic Selection and Stabilizing Selection on the Maintenance of Quantitative Genetic Variation at Mutation-Selection Balance
Genetics, September 1, 2002; 162(1): 459 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
X.-S. Zhang, J. Wang, and W. G. Hill
Pleiotropic Model of Maintenance of Quantitative Genetic Variation at Mutation-Selection Balance
Genetics, May 1, 2002; 161(1): 419 - 433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
T. F. Hansen and G. P. Wagner
Epistasis and the Mutation Load: A Measurement-Theoretical Approach
Genetics, May 1, 2001; 158(1): 477 - 485.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ScienceHome page
D. Waxman and J. R. Peck
Pleiotropy and the Preservation of Perfection
Science, February 20, 1998; 279(5354): 1210 - 1213.
[Abstract] [Full Text]