- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- A corrigendum has been published
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Foss, E.
- Articles by Steinberg, C. M.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Foss, E.
- Articles by Steinberg, C. M.
Genetics, Vol 133, 681-691, Copyright © 1993
INVESTIGATIONS |
Chiasma Interference as a Function of Genetic Distance
E. Foss, R. Lande, F. W. Stahl and C. M. Steinberg
Department of Biology and Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1299
For many organisms, meiotic double crossing over is less frequent than expected on the assumption that exchanges occur at random with respect to each other. This ``interference,'' which can be almost total for nearby intervals, diminishes as the intervals in which the double crossovers are scored are moved farther apart. Most models for interference have assumed, at least implicitly, that the intensity of interference depends inversely on the physical distance separating the intervals. However, several observations suggest that interference depends on genetic distance (Morgans) rather than physical distance (base pairs or micrometers). Accordingly, we devise a model in which interference is related directly to genetic distance. Its central feature is that recombinational intermediates (C's) have two fates-they can be resolved with crossing over (Cx) or without (Co). We suppose that C's are distributed at random with respect to each other (no interference); interference results from constraints on the resolution of C's. The basic constraint is that each pair of neighboring Cx's must have between them a certain number of Co's. The required number of intervening Co's for a given organism or chromosome is estimated from the fraction of gene conversions that are unaccompanied by crossover of flanking markers. The predictions of the model are compared with data from Drosophila and Neurospora.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. W. Stahl and H. M. Foss But See KITANI (1978) Genetics, March 1, 2008; 178(3): 1141 - 1145. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Getz, S. A. Banse, L. S. Young, A. V. Banse, J. Swanson, G. M. Wang, B. L. Browne, H. M. Foss, and F. W. Stahl Reduced Mismatch Repair of Heteroduplexes Reveals "Non"-interfering Crossing Over in Wild-Type Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, March 1, 2008; 178(3): 1251 - 1269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Falque, R. Mercier, C. Mezard, D. de Vienne, and O. C. Martin Patterns of Recombination and MLH1 Foci Density Along Mouse Chromosomes: Modeling Effects of Interference and Obligate Chiasma Genetics, July 1, 2007; 176(3): 1453 - 1467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-D. Tan and Y.-X. Fu A New Strategy for Estimating Recombination Fractions Between Dominant Markers From an F2 Population Genetics, February 1, 2007; 175(2): 923 - 931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-D. Tan and Y.-X. Fu A Novel Method for Estimating Linkage Maps Genetics, August 1, 2006; 173(4): 2383 - 2390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Armstrong, M. S. McPeek, and T. P. Speed Incorporating interference into linkage analysis for experimental crosses Biostat., July 1, 2006; 7(3): 374 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. de Boer, P. Stam, A. J. J. Dietrich, A. Pastink, and C. Heyting Two levels of interference in mouse meiotic recombination PNAS, June 20, 2006; 103(25): 9607 - 9612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Codina-Pascual, M. Campillo, J. Kraus, M.R. Speicher, J. Egozcue, J. Navarro, and J. Benet Crossover frequency and synaptonemal complex length: their variability and effects on human male meiosis Mol. Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 12(2): 123 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Y. Lam, S. R. Horn, S. J. Radford, E. A. Housworth, F. W. Stahl, and G. P. Copenhaver Crossover Interference on Nucleolus Organizing Region-Bearing Chromosomes in Arabidopsis Genetics, June 1, 2005; 170(2): 807 - 812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. W. Stahl, H. M. Foss, L. S. Young, R. H. Borts, M. F. F. Abdullah, and G. P. Copenhaver Does Crossover Interference Count in Saccharomyces cerevisiae? Genetics, September 1, 2004; 168(1): 35 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Malkova, J. Swanson, M. German, J. H. McCusker, E. A. Housworth, F. W. Stahl, and J. E. Haber Gene Conversion and Crossing Over Along the 405-kb Left Arm of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Chromosome VII Genetics, September 1, 2004; 168(1): 49 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Solignac, D. Vautrin, E. Baudry, F. Mougel, A. Loiseau, and J.-M. Cornuet A Microsatellite-Based Linkage Map of the Honeybee, Apis mellifera L. Genetics, May 1, 2004; 167(1): 253 - 262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Shinohara, K. Sakai, A. Shinohara, and D. K. Bishop Crossover Interference in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Requires a TID1/RDH54- and DMC1-Dependent Pathway Genetics, April 1, 2003; 163(4): 1273 - 1286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Fujitani, S. Mori, and I. Kobayashi A Reaction-Diffusion Model for Interference in Meiotic Crossing Over Genetics, May 1, 2002; 161(1): 365 - 372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. P. Copenhaver, E. A. Housworth, and F. W. Stahl Crossover Interference in Arabidopsis Genetics, April 1, 2002; 160(4): 1631 - 1639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. W. Broman, L. B. Rowe, G. A. Churchill, and K. Paigen Crossover Interference in the Mouse Genetics, March 1, 2002; 160(3): 1123 - 1131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Novak, P. B. Ross-Macdonald, and G. S. Roeder The Budding Yeast Msh4 Protein Functions in Chromosome Synapsis and the Regulation of Crossover Distribution Genetics, July 1, 2001; 158(3): 1013 - 1025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Teuscher, G. A. Brockmann, P. E. Rudolph, H. H. Swalve, and V. Guiard Models for Chromatid Interference With Applications to Recombination Data Genetics, November 1, 2000; 156(3): 1449 - 1460. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Takano-Shimizu Genetic Screens for Factors Involved in the Notum Bristle Loss of Interspecific Hybrids Between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans Genetics, September 1, 2000; 156(1): 269 - 282. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Browning The Relationship Between Count-Location and Stationary Renewal Models for the Chiasma Process Genetics, August 1, 2000; 155(4): 1955 - 1960. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Grushcow, T. M. Holzen, K. J. Park, T. Weinert, M. Lichten, and D. K. Bishop Saccharomyces cerevisiae Checkpoint Genes MEC1, RAD17 and RAD24 Are Required for Normal Meiotic Recombination Partner Choice Genetics, October 1, 1999; 153(2): 607 - 620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. Kaback, D. Barber, J. Mahon, J. Lamb, and J. You Chromosome Size-Dependent Control of Meiotic Reciprocal Recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: The Role of Crossover Interference Genetics, August 1, 1999; 152(4): 1475 - 1486. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Bowring and D. E. A. Catcheside Evidence for Negative Interference: Clustering of Crossovers Close to the am Locus in Neurospora crassa Among am Recombinants Genetics, July 1, 1999; 152(3): 965 - 969. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F. Paques and J. E. Haber Multiple Pathways of Recombination Induced by Double-Strand Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., June 1, 1999; 63(2): 349 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Taylor and G. R. Smith Regulation of homologous recombination: Chi inactivates RecBCD enzyme by disassembly of the three subunits Genes & Dev., April 1, 1999; 13(7): 890 - 900. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. K. Anderson, A. Reeves, L. M. Webb, and T. Ashley Distribution of Crossing Over on Mouse Synaptonemal Complexes Using Immunofluorescent Localization of MLH1 Protein Genetics, April 1, 1999; 151(4): 1569 - 1579. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhao and T. P. Speed Statistical Analysis of Ordered Tetrads Genetics, September 1, 1998; 150(1): 459 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhao and T. P. Speed Statistical Analysis of Half-Tetrads Genetics, September 1, 1998; 150(1): 473 - 485. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Long, Interrupted Conversion Tracts Initiated by cog in Neurospora crassa Genetics, January 1, 1998; 148(1): 113 - 122. |
||||
![]() |
A. Boulton, R. S. Myers, and R. J. Redfield The hotspot conversion paradox and the evolution of meiotic recombination PNAS, July 22, 1997; 94(15): 8058 - 8063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





