Genetics, Vol 132, 847-859, Copyright © 1992


INVESTIGATIONS

The Evolution of Tandemly Repetitive DNA: Recombination Rules

R. M. Harding, A. J. Boyce and J. B. Clegg
MRC Molecular Haematology Unit, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, England

Variable numbers of tandem repeats (VNTRs), which include hypervariable regions, minisatellites and microsatellites, can be assigned together with satellite DNAs to define a class of noncoding tandemly repetitive DNA (TR-DNA). The evolution of TR-DNA is assumed to be driven by an unbiased recombinational process. A simulation model of unequal exchange is presented and used to investigate the evolutionary persistence of single TR-DNA lineages. Three different recombination rules are specified to govern the expansion and contraction of a TR-DNA lineage from an initial array of two repeats to, finally, a single repeat allele, which cannot participate in a misalignment and exchange process. In the absence of amplification or selection acting to bias array evolution toward expansion, the probability of attaining a target array size is a function only of the initial number of repeats. We show that the proportions of lineages attaining a targeted array size are the same irrespective of recombination rule and rate, demonstrating that our simulation model is well behaved. The time taken to attain a target array size, the persistence of the target array, and the total persistence time of repetitive array structure, are functions of the initial number of repeats, the rate of recombination, and the rules of misalignment preceding recombinational exchange. These relationships are investigated using our simulation model. While misalignment contraint is probably greatest for satellite DNA it also seems important in accounting for the evolution of VNTR loci including minisatellites. This conclusion is consistent with the observed nonrandom distributions of VNTRs and other TR-DNAs in the human genome.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genome ResHome page
N. G. Faux, G. A. Huttley, K. Mahmood, G. I. Webb, M. Garcia de la Banda, and J. C. Whisstock
RCPdb: An evolutionary classification and codon usage database for repeat-containing proteins
Genome Res., July 1, 2007; 17(7): 1118 - 1127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
B. A. Lasker, G. Butler, and T. J. Lott
Molecular Genotyping of Candida parapsilosis Group I Clinical Isolates by Analysis of Polymorphic Microsatellite Markers.
J. Clin. Microbiol., March 1, 2006; 44(3): 750 - 759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. D. Shepherd, C. D. Millar, G. Ballard, D. G. Ainley, P. R. Wilson, G. D. Haynes, C. Baroni, and D. M. Lambert
From The Cover: Microevolution and mega-icebergs in the Antarctic
PNAS, November 15, 2005; 102(46): 16717 - 16722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
L. D. Shepherd and D. M. Lambert
Mutational Bias in Penguin Microsatellite DNA
J. Hered., September 1, 2005; 96(5): 566 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
Y.-C. Li, A. B. Korol, T. Fahima, and E. Nevo
Microsatellites Within Genes: Structure, Function, and Evolution
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2004; 21(6): 991 - 1007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
H. Hutter, B. E. Vogel, J. D. Plenefisch, C. R. Norris, R. B. Proenca, J. Spieth, C. Guo, S. Mastwal, X. Zhu, I. S. A. J. Scheel, et al.
Conservation and Novelty in the Evolution of Cell Adhesion and Extracellular Matrix Genes
Science, February 11, 2000; 287(5455): 989 - 994.
[Abstract] [Full Text]