- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Otto, S. P.
- Articles by Goldstein, D. B.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Otto, S. P.
- Articles by Goldstein, D. B.
Genetics, Vol 131, 745-751, Copyright © 1992
INVESTIGATIONS |
Recombination and the Evolution of Diploidy
S. P. Otto and D. B. Goldstein
Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
With two copies of every gene, a diploid organism is able to mask recessive deleterious mutations. In this paper we present the analysis of a two-locus model designed to determine when the masking of deleterious alleles favors the evolution of a dominant diploid phase in organisms that alternate between haploid and diploid phases (``alternation of generations''). It is hypothesized that diploidy will be favored whenever masking occurs (``the masking hypothesis''). Using analytical methods, we confirm that this masking hypothesis is essentially correct under free recombination: as long as the heterozygous expression of deleterious alleles is sufficiently masked by the wild-type allele, diploidy is favored over haploidy. When the rate of recombination is lower, however, diploidy is much less likely to be favored over haploidy. In fact, according to our model, the evolution of diploidy is impossible without significant levels of recombination even when masking is fairly strong.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  R. Froissart, C. O. Wilke, R. Montville, S. K. Remold, L. Chao, and P. E. Turner Co-infection Weakens Selection Against Epistatic Mutations in RNA Viruses Genetics, September 1, 2004; 168(1): 9 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. L. Nuismer and S. P. Otto Host-parasite interactions and the evolution of ploidy PNAS, July 27, 2004; 101(30): 11036 - 11039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. G. Spencer, M. W. Feldman, A. G. Clark, and A. E. Weisstein The Effect of Genetic Conflict on Genomic Imprinting and Modification of Expression at a Sex-Linked Locus Genetics, January 1, 2004; 166(1): 565 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. P. Otto The Advantages of Segregation and the Evolution of Sex Genetics, July 1, 2003; 164(3): 1099 - 1118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Zeyl, T. Vanderford, and M. Carter An Evolutionary Advantage of Haploidy in Large Yeast Populations Science, January 24, 2003; 299(5606): 555 - 558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. E. Weisstein, M. W. Feldman, and H. G. Spencer Evolutionary Genetic Models of the Ovarian Time Bomb Hypothesis for the Evolution of Genomic Imprinting Genetics, September 1, 2002; 162(1): 425 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. W. Hall The Evolution of Haploid, Diploid and Polymorphic Haploid-Diploid Life Cycles: The Role of Meiotic Mutation Genetics, October 1, 2000; 156(2): 893 - 898. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Wagner The Role of Population Size, Pleiotropy and Fitness Effects of Mutations in the Evolution of Overlapping Gene Functions Genetics, March 1, 2000; 154(3): 1389 - 1401. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Korona Unpredictable Fitness Transitions Between Haploid and Diploid Strains of the Genetically Loaded Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, January 1, 1999; 151(1): 77 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. G. Spencer, M. W. Feldman, and A. G. Clark Genetic Conflicts, Multiple Paternity and the Evolution of Genomic Imprinting Genetics, February 1, 1998; 148(2): 893 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|