- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Minkoff-III, C.
- Articles by Wilson, T. G.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Minkoff-III, C.
- Articles by Wilson, T. G.
Genetics, Vol 131, 91-97, Copyright © 1992
INVESTIGATIONS |
The Competitive Ability and Fitness Components of the Methoprene-tolerant (Met) Drosophila Mutant Resistant to Juvenile Hormone Analog Insecticides
C. Minkoff-III and T. G. Wilson
Present address: Department of Cell Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27705.
The Methoprene-tolerant (Met) mutation of Drosophila melanogaster results in a high (100-fold) level of resistance to the insecticide methoprene, a chemical analog of juvenile hormone. Pest species that are under control with methoprene may therefore have the potential to evolve resistance via a mutation homologous to Met. To evaluate the potential of such mutants to persist in wild populations, we must understand the fitness of flies carrying Met. In the absence of methoprene, Met flies were outcompeted by a wild-type strain both in a multigeneration population cage and in single-generation competition experiments. To determine which fitness component(s) is responsible for the competitive disadvantage, the survival, time of development, and fecundity of flies homozygous for each of five Met alleles were compared with wild type. Small but significant differences were found between the pooled Met alleles and wild type for pupal development time, pupal mortality, and early adult fecundity. These differences result in a large competitive disadvantage. Although Met flies were found to have reduced fitness by these measures, the phenotype is not as severe as might be expected from a knowledge of the disruption of juvenile hormone regulation seen in Met flies. It is concluded that (1) although Met flies have a large advantage under methoprene selection, they will quickly become outcompeted upon relaxation of methoprene usage, (2) even a seemingly severe disruption of juvenile hormone regulation has no drastic effect on the vital functions of the insect and (3) small differences in fitness components can translate into a large competitive disadvantage.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  T. G. Wilson and M. Ashok Insecticide resistance resulting from an absence of target-site gene product PNAS, November 24, 1998; 95(24): 14040 - 14044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Feyereisen Juvenile hormone resistance: ¡ no PASaran ! PNAS, March 17, 1998; 95(6): 2725 - 2726. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|