- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Qian, S.
- Articles by Pirrotta, V.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Qian, S.
- Articles by Pirrotta, V.
Genetics, Vol 131, 79-90, Copyright © 1992
INVESTIGATIONS |
Molecular Analysis of the zeste-white Interaction Reveals a Promoter-Proximal Element Essential for Distant Enhancer-Promoter Communication
S. Qian, B. Varjavand and V. Pirrotta
Department of Cell Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030
We have analyzed the eye and testis enhancers located 1 kb upstream of the transcription start site of the white gene. Both enhancers confer the corresponding tissue-specific expression on a heterologous promoter as well as on the white promoter. The eye determinant consists of multiple elements, each able to stimulate eye-specific expression. It also contains five binding sites for the zeste protein while the immediately adjacent testis element contains none. Site-directed mutation of these zeste binding sites abolishes the zeste-white interaction but does not significantly affect the eye enhancer activity, indicating that they are not important for the eye enhancer activity per se. Other zeste binding sites just upstream of the promoter are not necessary for the zeste-white interaction. We conclude that the overlap of the eye enhancer with the zeste binding sites is responsible for the zeste-white interaction and explains why this interaction affects eye but not testis expression. Sequence deletion or substitution experiments suggested that the white promoter is internal to the transcription start site; the zeste protein is not required for distant enhancer action but a 95-bp promoter-proximal sequence is essential for distant enhancer-promoter interaction. This element may serve as an anchor to stabilize formation of a loop that brings the enhancer to the vicinity of the promoter.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Chetverina, E. Savitskaya, O. Maksimenko, L. Melnikova, O. Zaytseva, A. Parshikov, A. V. Galkin, and P. Georgiev Red flag on the white reporter: a versatile insulator abuts the white gene in Drosophila and is omnipresent in mini-white constructs Nucleic Acids Res., February 11, 2008; 36(3): 929 - 937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Rodin, O. Kyrchanova, E. Pomerantseva, A. Parshikov, and P. Georgiev New Properties of Drosophila Fab-7 Insulator Genetics, September 1, 2007; 177(1): 113 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Kyrchanova, S. Toshchakov, A. Parshikov, and P. Georgiev Study of the Functional Interaction between Mcp Insulators from the Drosophila bithorax Complex: Effects of Insulator Pairing on Enhancer-Promoter Communication Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2007; 27(8): 3035 - 3043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Pomerantseva, I. Biryukova, R. Silicheva, E. Savitskaya, A. Golovnin, and P. Georgiev Transposition of Regulatory Elements by P-Element-Mediated Rearrangements in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, April 1, 2006; 172(4): 2283 - 2291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Dorsett, J. C. Eissenberg, Z. Misulovin, A. Martens, B. Redding, and K. McKim Effects of sister chromatid cohesion proteins on cut gene expression during wing development in Drosophila Development, November 1, 2005; 132(21): 4743 - 4753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Gruzdeva, O. Kyrchanova, A. Parshikov, A. Kullyev, and P. Georgiev The Mcp Element from the bithorax Complex Contains an Insulator That Is Capable of Pairwise Interactions and Can Facilitate Enhancer-Promoter Communication Mol. Cell. Biol., May 1, 2005; 25(9): 3682 - 3689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Rollins, M. Korom, N. Aulner, A. Martens, and D. Dorsett Drosophila Nipped-B Protein Supports Sister Chromatid Cohesion and Opposes the Stromalin/Scc3 Cohesion Factor To Facilitate Long-Range Activation of the cut Gene Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2004; 24(8): 3100 - 3111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Baldrich, A. Velazquez, N. Xamena, and O. Cabre Germline mutations induced by N-nitroso-N-ethylurea do not affect the inserted copia retrotransposon in a Drosophila melanogaster wa mutant Mutagenesis, November 1, 2003; 18(6): 527 - 531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Golovnin, I. Biryukova, O. Romanova, M. Silicheva, A. Parshikov, E. Savitskaya, V. Pirrotta, and P. Georgiev An endogenous Su(Hw) insulator separates the yellow gene from the Achaete-scute gene complex in Drosophila Development, July 15, 2003; 130(14): 3249 - 3258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Mason, A. Y. Konev, M. D. Golubovsky, and H. Biessmann Cis- and trans-acting Influences on Telomeric Position Effect in Drosophila melanogaster Detected With a Subterminal Transgene Genetics, March 1, 2003; 163(3): 917 - 930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Conte, B. Dastugue, and C. Vaury Coupling of Enhancer and Insulator Properties Identified in Two Retrotransposons Modulates Their Mutagenic Impact on Nearby Genes Mol. Cell. Biol., March 15, 2002; 22(6): 1767 - 1777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. West, M. Gaszner, and G. Felsenfeld Insulators: many functions, many mechanisms Genes & Dev., February 1, 2002; 16(3): 271 - 288. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Muravyova, A. Golovnin, E. Gracheva, A. Parshikov, T. Belenkaya, V. Pirrotta, and P. Georgiev Loss of Insulator Activity by Paired Su(Hw) Chromatin Insulators Science, January 19, 2001; 291(5503): 495 - 498. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S Poux, D McCabe, and V Pirrotta Recruitment of components of Polycomb Group chromatin complexes in Drosophila Development, January 1, 2001; 128(1): 75 - 85. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Kutach and J. T. Kadonaga The Downstream Promoter Element DPE Appears To Be as Widely Used as the TATA Box in Drosophila Core Promoters Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2000; 20(13): 4754 - 4764. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Soldatov, E. Nabirochkina, S. Georgieva, T. Belenkaja, and P. Georgiev TAFII40 Protein Is Encoded by the e(y)1 Gene: Biological Consequences of Mutations Mol. Cell. Biol., May 1, 1999; 19(5): 3769 - 3778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Sipos, J. Mihaly, F. Karch, P. Schedl, J. Gausz, and H. Gyurkovics Transvection in the Drosophila Abd-B Domain: Extensive Upstream Sequences Are Involved in Anchoring Distant cis-Regulatory Regions to the Promoter Genetics, June 1, 1998; 149(2): 1031 - 1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Polycomb Group Repression Is Blocked by the Drosophila suppressor of Hairy-wing [su(Hw)] Insulator Genetics, January 1, 1998; 148(1): 331 - 340. |
||||
![]() |
S. Lin, M. Lin, P Horvath, K. Reddy, and R. Storti PDP1, a novel Drosophila PAR domain bZIP transcription factor expressed in developing mesoderm, endoderm and ectoderm, is a transcriptional regulator of somatic muscle genes Development, January 11, 1997; 124(22): 4685 - 4696. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||






