- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Baran, G.
- Articles by Wessler, S.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Baran, G.
- Articles by Wessler, S.
Genetics, Vol 130, 377-384, Copyright © 1992
INVESTIGATIONS |
Molecular Analysis of the Maize wx-B3 Allele Indicates That Precise Excision of the Transposable Ac Element Is Rare
G. Baran, C. Echt, T. Bureau and S. Wessler
Deceased.
The somatic and germinal behavior of the maize wx-B3 mutation indicates that this Ac allele rarely reverts. Endosperms containing wx-B3 display tiny and infrequent Wx revertant sectors while no significant reversion is detected when wx-B3 pollen is stained with I/KI. Previous studies of other transposable element alleles that revert infrequently have implicated low levels of element excision. Unlike these other alleles, the wx-B3 Ac element is indistinguishable from fully active Ac elements with respect to its structure, and its ability to transpose from the Wx gene or to trans-activate a Ds element. Characterization of somatic and germinal excision events lead us to conclude that excision of the wx-B3 Ac element almost always produces null alleles. Furthermore, the excellent correlation between the position of the wx-B3 mutation on the physical and genetic maps indicates that the Ac insertion is the only lesion of wx-B3. As a result, precise excision of this Ac should restore Wx function. The fact that revertant sectors and pollen grains are rare indicates that precise excision of Ac is also rare. The finding that the wx-B3 reversion frequency is comparable whether wx-B3 is hemizygous or over a wx allele with a wild-type insertion site illustrates a fundamental difference between the excision mechanisms of Ac and Drosophila P elements.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  J. Li, T.-J. Wen, and P. S. Schnable Role of RAD51 in the Repair of MuDR-Induced Double-Strand Breaks in Maize (Zea mays L.) Genetics, January 1, 2008; 178(1): 57 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Bai, M. Singh, L. Pitt, M. Sweeney, and T. P. Brutnell Generating Novel Allelic Variation Through Activator Insertional Mutagenesis in Maize Genetics, March 1, 2007; 175(3): 981 - 992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Yang, C. F. Weil, and S. R. Wessler A Rice Tc1/Mariner-Like Element Transposes in Yeast PLANT CELL, October 1, 2006; 18(10): 2469 - 2478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Gorbunova and A. A. Levy Analysis of Extrachromosomal Ac/Ds Transposable Elements Genetics, May 1, 2000; 155(1): 349 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. van Houwelingen, E. Souer, J. Mol, and R. Koes Epigenetic Interactions among Three dTph1 Transposons in Two Homologous Chromosomes Activate a New Excision–Repair Mechanism in Petunia PLANT CELL, July 1, 1999; 11(7): 1319 - 1336. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|