- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Coyne, J. A.
- Articles by Berry, A.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Coyne, J. A.
- Articles by Berry, A.
Genetics, Vol 129, 791-802, Copyright © 1991
INVESTIGATIONS |
Lack of Underdominance in a Naturally Occurring Pericentric Inversion in Drosophila melanogaster and Its Implications for Chromosome Evolution
J. A. Coyne, S. Aulard and A. Berry
Department of Ecology and Evolution, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
In(2LR)PL is a large pericentric inversion polymorphic in populations of Drosophila melanogaster on two Indian Ocean islands. This polymorphism is puzzling: because crossing over in female heterokaryotypes produces inviable zygotes, such inversions are thought to be underdominant and should be quickly eliminated from populations. The observed fixation for such inversions among related species has led to the idea that genetic drift can cause chromosome evolution in opposition to natural selection. We found, however, that In(2LR)PL is not underdominant for fertility, as heterokaryotypic females produce perfectly viable eggs. Genetic analysis shows that the lack of underdominance results from the nearly complete absence of crossing over in the inverted region. This phenomenon is probably caused by mechanical and not genetic factors, because crossing over is not suppressed in In(2LR)PL homokaryotypes. Our observations do not support the idea that the fixation of pericentric inversions among closely related species implies the action of genetic drift overcoming strong natural selection in very small populations. If chromosome arrangements vary in their underdominance, it is those with the least disadvantage as heterozygotes, like In(2LR)PL, that will be polymorphic or fixed in natural populations.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  S. Glinka, D. De Lorenzo, and W. Stephan Evidence of Gene Conversion Associated with a Selective Sweep in Drosophila melanogaster Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2006; 23(10): 1869 - 1878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Z. Lai, T. Nakazato, M. Salmaso, J. M. Burke, S. Tang, S. J. Knapp, and L. H. Rieseberg Extensive Chromosomal Repatterning and the Evolution of Sterility Barriers in Hybrid Sunflower Species Genetics, September 1, 2005; 171(1): 291 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Piccinali, M. Aguade, and E. Hasson Comparative Molecular Population Genetics of the Xdh Locus in the Cactophilic Sibling Species Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2004; 21(1): 141 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. F. McAllister Sequence Differentiation Associated With an Inversion on the Neo-X Chromosome of Drosophila americana Genetics, November 1, 2003; 165(3): 1317 - 1328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. A. F. Noor, K. L. Grams, L. A. Bertucci, and J. Reiland Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species PNAS, September 26, 2001; (2001) 221274498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. F. Noor, K. L. Grams, L. A. Bertucci, and J. Reiland Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species PNAS, October 9, 2001; 98(21): 12084 - 12088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|