Genetics, Vol 129, 409-422, Copyright © 1991


INVESTIGATIONS

The lethal(1)TW-6(cs) Mutation of Drosophila melanogaster Is a Dominant Antimorphic Allele of nod and Is Associated With a Single Base Change in the Putative ATP-Binding Domain

R. S. Rasooly, C. M. New, P. Zhang, R. S. Hawley and B. S. Baker
Department of Molecular Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461

The l(1)TW-6(cs) mutation is a cold-sensitive recessive lethal mutation in Drosophila melanogaster, that affects both meiotic and mitotic chromosome segregation. We report the isolation of three revertants of this mutation. All three revert both the meiotic and mitotic effects as well as the cold sensitivity, demonstrating that all three phenotypes are due to a single lesion. We further show that these revertants fail to complement an amorphic allele of the nod (no distributive disjunction) locus, which encodes a kinesin-like protein. These experiments demonstrate that l(1)TW-6(cs) is an antimorphic allele of nod, and we rename it nod(DTW). Sequencing of the nod locus on a nod(DTW)-bearing chromosome reveals a single base change in the putative ATP-binding region of the motor domain of nod. Recessive, loss-of-function mutations at the nod locus specifically disrupt the segregation of nonexchange chromosomes in female meiosis. We demonstrate that, at 23.5{deg}, the meiotic defects in nod(DTW)/+ females are similar to those observed in nod/nod females; that is, the segregation of nonexchange chromosomes is abnormal. However, in nod(DTW)/nod(DTW) females, or in nod(DTW)/+ females at 18{deg}, we observe a more severe meiotic defect that apparently affects the segregation of both exchange and nonexchange chromosomes. In addition, nod(DTW) homozygotes and hemizygous males have previously been shown to exhibit mitotic defects including somatic chromosome breakage and loss. We propose that the defective protein encoded by the nod(DTW) allele interferes with proper chromosome movement during both meiosis and mitosis, perhaps by binding irreversibly to microtubules.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. Wu, V. Singaram, and K. S. McKim
mei-38 Is Required for Chromosome Segregation During Meiosis in Drosophila Females
Genetics, September 1, 2008; 180(1): 61 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
R. S. Hawley and W. D. Gilliland
Sometimes the Result Is Not the Answer: The Truths and the Lies That Come From Using the Complementation Test
Genetics, September 1, 2006; 174(1): 5 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
W. Cui, L. R. Sproul, S. M. Gustafson, H. J.G. Matthies, S. P. Gilbert, and R. S. Hawley
Drosophila Nod Protein Binds Preferentially to the Plus Ends of Microtubules and Promotes Microtubule Polymerization In Vitro
Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2005; 16(11): 5400 - 5409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
K. S. Ho, K. Suyama, M. Fish, and M. P. Scott
Differential regulation of Hedgehog target gene transcription by Costal2 and Suppressor of Fused
Development, March 15, 2005; 132(6): 1401 - 1412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. L. Argueso, J. Wanat, Z. Gemici, and E. Alani
Competing Crossover Pathways Act During Meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Genetics, December 1, 2004; 168(4): 1805 - 1816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. E. Koehler, E. A. Millie, J. P. Cherry, S. E. Schrump, and T. J. Hassold
Meiotic Exchange and Segregation in Female Mice Heterozygous for Paracentric Inversions
Genetics, March 1, 2004; 166(3): 1199 - 1214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
D. Harris, C. Orme, J. Kramer, L. Namba, M. Champion, M. J. Palladino, J. Natzle, and R. S. Hawley
A Deficiency Screen of the Major Autosomes Identifies a Gene (matrimony) That Is Haplo-insufficient for Achiasmate Segregation in Drosophila Oocytes
Genetics, October 1, 2003; 165(2): 637 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. B. Barton, Y. Su, J. Lamb, D. Barber, and D. B. Kaback
A Function for Subtelomeric DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Genetics, October 1, 2003; 165(2): 929 - 934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
A. Silvanovich, M.-g. Li, M. Serr, S. Mische, and T. S. Hays
The Third P-loop Domain in Cytoplasmic Dynein Heavy Chain Is Essential for Dynein Motor Function and ATP-sensitive Microtubule Binding
Mol. Biol. Cell, April 1, 2003; 14(4): 1355 - 1365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. L. Giunta, J. K. Jang, E. A. Manheim, G. Subramanian, and K. S. McKim
subito Encodes a Kinesin-like Protein Required for Meiotic Spindle Pole Formation in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, April 1, 2002; 160(4): 1489 - 1501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
H. J.G. Matthies, R. J. Baskin, and R. S. Hawley
Orphan Kinesin NOD Lacks Motile Properties But Does Possess a Microtubule-stimulated ATPase Activity
Mol. Biol. Cell, December 1, 2001; 12(12): 4000 - 4012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. D. Krawchuk and W. P. Wahls
Centromere Mapping Functions for Aneuploid Meiotic Products: Analysis of rec8, rec10 and rec11 Mutants of the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Genetics, September 1, 1999; 153(1): 49 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. D. Krawchuk, L. C. DeVeaux, and W. P. Wahls
Meiotic Chromosome Dynamics Dependent Upon the rec8+, rec10+ and rec11+ Genes of the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Genetics, September 1, 1999; 153(1): 57 - 68.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. M. Kapoor and T. J. Mitchison
Allele-specific activators and inhibitors for kinesin
PNAS, August 3, 1999; 96(16): 9106 - 9111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. E. Zwick, J. L. Salstrom, and C. H. Langley
Genetic Variation in Rates of Nondisjunction: Association of Two Naturally Occurring Polymorphisms in the Chromokinesin nod With Increased Rates of Nondisjunction in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, August 1, 1999; 152(4): 1605 - 1614.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. E. Zwick, D. J. Cutler, and C. H. Langley
Classic Weinstein: Tetrad Analysis, Genetic Variation and Achiasmate Segregation in Drosophila and Humans
Genetics, August 1, 1999; 152(4): 1615 - 1629.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. J. Beumer, S. Pimpinelli, and K. G. Golic
Induced Chromosomal Exchange Directs the Segregation of Recombinant Chromatids in Mitosis of Drosophila
Genetics, September 1, 1998; 150(1): 173 - 188.
[Full Text]