Genetics, Vol 128, 739-750, Copyright © 1991

INVESTIGATIONS

Genetic Variance for Body Size in a Natural Population of Drosophila buzzatii

A. Ruiz, M. Santos, A. Barbadilla, J. E. Quezada-Diaz, E. Hasson and A. Fontdevila
Departament de Genetica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain

Previous work has shown thorax length to be under directional selection in the Drosophila buzzatii population of Carboneras. In order to predict the genetic consequences of natural selection, genetic variation for this trait was investigated in two ways. First, narrow sense heritability was estimated in the laboratory F(2) generation of a sample of wild flies by means of the offspring-parent regression. A relatively high value, 0.59, was obtained. Because the phenotypic variance of wild flies was 7-9 times that of the flies raised in the laboratory, ``natural'' heritability may be estimated as one-seventh to one-ninth that value. Second, the contribution of the second and fourth chromosomes, which are polymorphic for paracentric inversions, to the genetic variance of thorax length was estimated in the field and in the laboratory. This was done with the assistance of a simple genetic model which shows that the variance among chromosome arrangements and the variance among karyotypes provide minimum estimates of the chromosome's contribution to the additive and genetic variances of the triat, respectively. In males raised under optimal conditions in the laboratory, the variance among second-chromosome karyotypes accounted for 11.43% of the total phenotypic variance and most of this variance was additive; by contrast, the contribution of the fourth chromosome was nonsignificant. The variance among second-chromosome karyotypes accounted for 1.56-1.78% of the total phenotypic variance in wild males and was nonsignificant in wild females. The variance among fourth chromosome karyotypes accounted for 0.14-3.48% of the total phenotypic variance in wild flies. At both chromosomes, the proportion of additive variance was higher in mating flies than in nonmating flies.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Laayouni, E. Hasson, M. Santos, and A. Fontdevila The Evolutionary History of Drosophila buzzatii. XXXV. Inversion Polymorphism and Nucleotide Variability in Different Regions of the Second Chromosome Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2003; 20(6): 931 - 944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Laayouni, M. Santos, and A. Fontdevila Toward a Physical Map of Drosophila buzzatii: Use of Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA Polymorphisms and Sequence-Tagged Site Landmarks Genetics, December 1, 2000; 156(4): 1797 - 1816. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. Cáceres, J. M. Ranz, A. Barbadilla, M. Long, and A. Ruiz Generation of a Widespread Drosophila Inversion by a Transposable Element Science, July 16, 1999; 285(5426): 415 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text]