- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Valent, B.
- Articles by Chumley, F. G.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Valent, B.
- Articles by Chumley, F. G.
Genetics, Vol 127, 87-101, Copyright © 1991
INVESTIGATIONS |
Magnaporthe grisea Genes for Pathogenicity and Virulence Identified Through a Series of Backcrosses
B. Valent, L. Farrall and F. G. Chumley
Central Research and Development Department, The Du Pont Company, Wilmington, Delaware 19880-0402
We have identified genes for pathogenicity toward rice (Oryza sativa) and genes for virulence toward specific rice cultivars in the plant pathogenic fungus Magnaporthe grisea. A genetic cross was conducted between the weeping lovegrass (Eragrostis curvula) pathogen 4091-5-8, a highly fertile, hermaphroditic laboratory strain, and the rice pathogen O-135, a poorly fertile, female-sterile field isolate that infects weeping lovegrass as well as rice. A six-generation backcrossing scheme was then undertaken with the rice pathogen as the recurrent parent. One goal of these crosses was to generate rice pathogenic progeny with the high fertility characteristic of strain 4091-5-8, which would permit rigorous genetic analysis of rice pathogens. Therefore, progeny strains to be used as parents for backcross generations were chosen only on the basis of fertility. The ratios of pathogenic to nonpathogenic (and virulent to avirulent) progeny through the backcross generations suggested that the starting parent strains differ in two types of genes that control the ability to infect rice. First, they differ by polygenic factors that determine the extent of lesion development achieved by those progeny that infect rice. These genes do not appear to play a role in infection of weeping lovegrass because both parents and all progeny infect weeping lovegrass. Second, the parents differ by simple Mendelian determinants, ``avirulence genes,'' that govern virulence toward specific rice cultivars in all-or-none fashion. Several crosses confirm the segregation of three unlinked avirulence genes, Avr1-CO39, Avr1-M201 and Avr1-YAMO, alleles of which determine avirulence on rice cultivars CO39, M201, and Yashiro-mochi, respectively. Interestingly, avirulence alleles of Avr1-CO39, Avr1-M201 and Avr1-YAMO were inherited from the parent strain 4091-5-8, which is a nonpathogen of rice. Middle repetitive DNA sequences (``MGR sequences''), present in approximately 40-50 copies in the genome of the rice pathogen parent, and in very low copy number in the genome of the nonpathogen of rice, were used as physical markers to monitor restoration of the rice pathogen genetic background during introgression of fertility. The introgression of highest levels of fertility into the most successful rice pathogen progeny was incomplete by the sixth generation, perhaps a consequence of genetic linkage between genes for fertility and genes for rice pathogenicity. One chromosomal DNA segment with MGR sequence homology appeared to be linked to the gene Avr1-CO39. Finally, many of the crosses described in this paper exhibited a characteristic common to many crosses involving M. grisea rice pathogen field isolates. That is, pigment-defective mutants frequently appeared among the progeny.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C.-L. Huang, S.-Y. Hwang, Y.-C. Chiang, and T.-P. Lin Molecular Evolution of the Pi-ta Gene Resistant to Rice Blast in Wild Rice (Oryza rufipogon) Genetics, July 1, 2008; 179(3): 1527 - 1538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Mehrabi, S. Ding, and J.-R. Xu MADS-Box Transcription Factor Mig1 Is Required for Infectious Growth in Magnaporthe grisea Eukaryot. Cell, May 1, 2008; 7(5): 791 - 799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Skamnioti and S. J. Gurr Magnaporthe grisea Cutinase2 Mediates Appressorium Differentiation and Host Penetration and Is Required for Full Virulence PLANT CELL, August 1, 2007; 19(8): 2674 - 2689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Kankanala, K. Czymmek, and B. Valent Roles for Rice Membrane Dynamics and Plasmodesmata during Biotrophic Invasion by the Blast Fungus PLANT CELL, February 1, 2007; 19(2): 706 - 724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Sun, A. Suresh, Y. Z. Deng, and N. I. Naqvi A Multidrug Resistance Transporter in Magnaporthe Is Required for Host Penetration and for Survival during Oxidative Stress PLANT CELL, December 1, 2006; 18(12): 3686 - 3705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. C. Couch, I. Fudal, M.-H. Lebrun, D. Tharreau, B. Valent, P. van Kim, J.-L. Notteghem, and L. M. Kohn Origins of Host-Specific Populations of the Blast Pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae in Crop Domestication With Subsequent Expansion of Pandemic Clones on Rice and Weeds of Rice Genetics, June 1, 2005; 170(2): 613 - 630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Jia, Z. Wang, and P. Singh Development of Dominant Rice Blast Pi-ta Resistance Gene Markers Crop Sci., November 1, 2002; 42(6): 2145 - 2149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Xue, G. Park, W. Choi, L. Zheng, R. A. Dean, and J.-R. Xu Two Novel Fungal Virulence Genes Specifically Expressed in Appressoria of the Rice Blast Fungus PLANT CELL, September 1, 2002; 14(9): 2107 - 2119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Czymmek, T. M. Bourett, J. A. Sweigard, A. Carroll, and R. J. Howard Utility of cytoplasmic fluorescent proteins for live-cell imaging of Magnaporthe grisea in planta Mycologia, March 1, 2002; 94(2): 280 - 289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Farman Meiotic Deletion at the BUF1 Locus of the Fungus Magnaporthe grisea Is Controlled by Interaction With the Homologous Chromosome Genetics, January 1, 2002; 160(1): 137 - 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. V. Balhadere and N. J. Talbot PDE1 Encodes a P-Type ATPase Involved in Appressorium-Mediated Plant Infection by the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe grisea PLANT CELL, September 1, 2001; 13(9): 1987 - 2004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Orbach, L. Farrall, J. A. Sweigard, F. G. Chumley, and B. Valent A Telomeric Avirulence Gene Determines Efficacy for the Rice Blast Resistance Gene Pi-ta PLANT CELL, November 1, 2000; 12(11): 2019 - 2032. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. T. Bryan, K.-S. Wu, L. Farrall, Y. Jia, H. P. Hershey, S. A. McAdams, K. N. Faulk, G. K. Donaldson, R. Tarchini, and B. Valent tA Single Amino Acid Difference Distinguishes Resistant and Susceptible Alleles of the Rice Blast Resistance Gene Pi-ta PLANT CELL, November 1, 2000; 12(11): 2033 - 2046. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. DeZwaan, A. M. Carroll, B. Valent, and J. A. Sweigard Magnaporthe grisea Pth11p Is a Novel Plasma Membrane Protein That Mediates Appressorium Differentiation in Response to Inductive Substrate Cues PLANT CELL, October 1, 1999; 11(10): 2013 - 2030. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. P. Dixon, J.-R. Xu, N. Smirnoff, and N. J. Talbot Independent Signaling Pathways Regulate Cellular Turgor during Hyperosmotic Stress and Appressorium-Mediated Plant Infection by Magnaporthe grisea PLANT CELL, October 1, 1999; 11(10): 2045 - 2058. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Farman and S. A. Leong Chromosome Walking to the AVR1-CO39 Avirulence Gene of Magnaporthe grisea: Discrepancy Between the Physical and Genetic Maps Genetics, November 1, 1998; 150(3): 1049 - 1058. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J R Xu and J E Hamer MAP kinase and cAMP signaling regulate infection structure formation and pathogenic growth in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Genes & Dev., November 1, 1996; 10(21): 2696 - 2706. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. HAMER Molecular Probes for Rice Blast Disease Science, May 3, 1991; 252(5006): 632 - 633. [PDF] |
||||






