Genetics, Vol 127, 125-138, Copyright © 1991


INVESTIGATIONS

The doublesex Locus of Drosophila melanogaster and Its Flanking Regions: A Cytogenetic Analysis

B. S. Baker, G. Hoff, T. C. Kaufman, M. F. Wolfner and T. Hazelrigg
Biology Department, University of California, San Diego, California 92093 Current address: Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305.

The region of the third chromosome (84D-F) of Drosophila melanogaster that contains the doublesex (dsx) locus has been cytogenetically analyzed. Twenty nine newly induced, and 42 preexisting rearrangements broken in dsx and the regions flanking dsx have been cytologically and genetically characterized. These studies established that the dsx locus is in salivary chromosome band 84E1-2. In addition, these observations provide strong evidence that the dsx locus functions only to regulate sexual differentiation and does not encode a vital function. To obtain new alleles at the dsx locus and to begin to analyze the genes flanking dsx, 59 lethal and visible mutations in a region encompassing dsx were induced. These mutations together with preexisting mutations in the region were deficiency mapped and placed into complementation groups. Among the mutations we isolated, four new mutations affecting sexual differentiation were identified. All proved to be alleles of dsx, suggesting that dsx is the only gene in this region involved in regulating sexual differentiation. All but one of the new dsx alleles have equivalent effects in males and females. The exception, dsx(EFH55), strongly affects female sexual differentiation, but only weakly affects male sexual differentiation. The interactions of dsx(EFH55) with mutations in other genes affecting sexual differentiation are described. These results are discussed in terms of the recent molecular findings that the dsx locus encodes sex-specific proteins that share in common their amino termini but have different carboxyl termini. The 72 mutations in this region that do not affect sexual differentiation identify 25 complementation groups. A translocation, T(2;3)Es that is associated with a lethal allele in one of these complementation groups is also broken at the engrailed (en) locus on the second chromosome and has a dominant phenotype that may be due to the expression of en in the anterior portion of the abdominal tergites where en is not normally expressed. The essential genes found in the 84D-F region are not evenly distributed throughout this region; most strikingly the 84D1-11 region appears to be devoid of essential genes. It is suggested that the lack of essential genes in this region is due to the region (1) containing genes with nonessential functions and (2) being duplicated, possibly both internally and elsewhere in the genome.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
H. Duan, C. Zhang, J. Chen, H. Sink, E. Frei, and M. Noll
A key role of Pox meso in somatic myogenesis of Drosophila
Development, November 15, 2007; 134(22): 3985 - 3997.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. Lee, J. H. Bahn, and J. H. Park
Sex- and clock-controlled expression of the neuropeptide F gene in Drosophila
PNAS, August 15, 2006; 103(33): 12580 - 12585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. M. Rawls Jr.
Analysis of Pyrimidine Catabolism in Drosophila melanogaster Using Epistatic Interactions With Mutations of Pyrimidine Biosynthesis and {beta}-Alanine Metabolism
Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1665 - 1674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
N. Malmanche and D. V. Clark
Drosophila melanogaster Prat, a Purine de Novo Synthesis Gene, Has a Pleiotropic Maternal-Effect Phenotype
Genetics, December 1, 2004; 168(4): 2011 - 2023.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
R. E. Ward, J. Evans, and C. S. Thummel
Genetic Modifier Screens in Drosophila Demonstrate a Role for Rho1 Signaling in Ecdysone-Triggered Imaginal Disc Morphogenesis
Genetics, November 1, 2003; 165(3): 1397 - 1415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
E. Keisman and B. Baker
The Drosophila sex determination hierarchy modulates wingless and decapentaplegic signaling to deploy dachshund sex-specifically in the genital imaginal disc
Development, January 5, 2001; 128(9): 1643 - 1656.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
S. N. Prokopenko, Y. He, Y. Lu, and H. J. Bellen
Mutations Affecting the Development of the Peripheral Nervous System in Drosophila: A Molecular Screen for Novel Proteins
Genetics, December 1, 2000; 156(4): 1691 - 1715.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
S Brown and J Castelli-Gair Hombria
Drosophila grain encodes a GATA transcription factor required for cell rearrangement during morphogenesis
Development, January 11, 2000; 127(22): 4867 - 4876.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
W An and P C Wensink
Integrating sex- and tissue-specific regulation within a single Drosophila enhancer.
Genes & Dev., January 15, 1995; 9(2): 256 - 266.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
M. Pultz and B. Baker
The dual role of hermaphrodite in the Drosophila sex determination regulatory hierarchy
Development, January 1, 1995; 121(1): 99 - 111.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
K T Coschigano and P C Wensink
Sex-specific transcriptional regulation by the male and female doublesex proteins of Drosophila.
Genes & Dev., January 1, 1993; 7(1): 42 - 54.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
C H Girdham and D M Glover
Chromosome tangling and breakage at anaphase result from mutations in lodestar, a Drosophila gene encoding a putative nucleoside triphosphate-binding protein.
Genes & Dev., October 1, 1991; 5(10): 1786 - 1799.
[Abstract] [PDF]