- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Wagner, G. P.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Wagner, G. P.
Genetics, Vol 122, 223-234, Copyright © 1989
INVESTIGATIONS |
Multivariate Mutation-Selection Balance With Constrained Pleiotropic Effects
G. P. Wagner
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60201
A multivariate quantitative genetic model is analyzed that is based on the assumption that the genetic variation at a locus j primarily influences an underlying physiological variable y(j), while influence on the genotypic values is determined by a kind of ``developmental function'' which is not changed by mutations at this locus. Assuming additivity among loci the developmental function becomes a linear transformation of the underlying variables y onto the genotypic values x, x = By. In this way the pleiotropic effects become constrained by the structure of the B-matrix. The equilibrium variance under mutation-stabilizing selection balance in infinite and finite populations is derived by using the house of cards approximation. The results are compared to the predictions given by M. Turelli in 1985 for pleiotropic two-character models. It is shown that the B-matrix model gives the same results as Turelli's five-allele model, suggesting that the crucial factor determining the equilibrium variance in multivariate models with pleiotropy is the assumption about constraints on the pleiotropic effects, and not the number of alleles as proposed by Turelli. Finally it is shown that under Gaussian stabilizing selection the structure of the B-matrix has effectively no influence on the mean equilibrium fitness of an infinite population. Hence the B-matrix and consequently to some extent also the structure of the genetic correlation matrix is an almost neutral character. The consequences for the evolution of genetic covariance matrices are discussed.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X. Gu Evolutionary Framework for Protein Sequence Evolution and Gene Pleiotropy Genetics, April 1, 2007; 175(4): 1813 - 1822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Turelli and N. H. Barton Polygenic Variation Maintained by Balancing Selection: Pleiotropy, Sex-Dependent Allelic Effects and G x E Interactions Genetics, February 1, 2004; 166(2): 1053 - 1079. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Mezey and D. Houle Comparing G Matrices: Are Common Principal Components Informative? Genetics, September 1, 2003; 165(1): 411 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Waxman and J. R. Peck Pleiotropy and the Preservation of Perfection Science, February 20, 1998; 279(5354): 1210 - 1213. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||

