- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- A corrigendum has been published
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Gailey, D. A.
- Articles by Hall, J. C.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Gailey, D. A.
- Articles by Hall, J. C.
Genetics, Vol 121, 773-785, Copyright © 1989
INVESTIGATIONS |
Behavior and Cytogenetics of fruitless in Drosophila melanogaster: Different Courtship Defects Caused by Separate, Closely Linked Lesions
D. A. Gailey and J. C. Hall
Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02254
The fruitless (fru) courtship mutant was dissected into three defects of male reproductive behavior, which were separable as to their genetic etiologies by application of existing and newly induced chromosomal aberrations. fru itself is a small inversion [In(3R) 90C; 91B] on genetic and cytological criteria. Uncovering the fru distal breakpoint with deletions usually led to males with two of the fru courtship abnormalities: no copulation attempts with females (hence, behavioral sterility) and vigorous courtship among males, including the formation of ``courtship chains.'' However, certain genetic changes involving region 91B resulted in males who formed courtship chains but who mated with females. Uncovering the fru proximal breakpoint led to males that passively elicit inappropriately high levels of courtship. This elicitation property was separable genetically from the sterility and chain formation phenotypes and provisionally mapped to the interval 89F-90F, which includes the fru proximal breakpoint. Behavioral sterility and chaining were also observed in males expressing certain abnormal genotypes, independent of the fru inversion. These included combinations of deficiencies, each with a breakpoint in 91B, and a transposon inserted in 91B.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Nuzzo Profile of Jeffrey C. Hall PNAS, November 15, 2005; 102(46): 16547 - 16549. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Villella, S. L. Ferri, J. D. Krystal, and J. C. Hall Inaugural Article: Functional analysis of fruitless gene expression by transgenic manipulations of Drosophila courtship PNAS, November 15, 2005; 102(46): 16550 - 16557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kuniyoshi, K. Baba, R. Ueda, S. Kondo, W. Awano, N. Juni, and D. Yamamoto lingerer, a Drosophila Gene Involved in Initiation and Termination of Copulation, Encodes a Set of Novel Cytoplasmic Proteins Genetics, December 1, 2002; 162(4): 1775 - 1789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Dauwalder, S. Tsujimoto, J. Moss, and W. Mattox The Drosophila takeout gene is regulated by the somatic sex-determination pathway and affects male courtship behavior Genes & Dev., November 15, 2002; 16(22): 2879 - 2892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kitamoto Conditional disruption of synaptic transmission induces male-male courtship behavior in Drosophila PNAS, October 1, 2002; 99(20): 13232 - 13237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Anand, A. Villella, L. C. Ryner, T. Carlo, S. F. Goodwin, H.-J. Song, D. A. Gailey, A. Morales, J. C. Hall, B. S. Baker, et al. Molecular Genetic Dissection of the Sex-Specific and Vital Functions of the Drosophila melanogaster Sex Determination Gene fruitless Genetics, August 1, 2001; 158(4): 1569 - 1595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Lee and J. C. Hall Abnormalities of Male-Specific FRU Protein and Serotonin Expression in the CNS of fruitless Mutants in Drosophila J. Neurosci., January 15, 2001; 21(2): 513 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Gaines, L. Tompkins, C. T. Woodard, and J. R. Carlson quick-to-court, a Drosophila Mutant With Elevated Levels of Sexual Behavior, Is Defective in a Predicted Coiled-Coil Protein Genetics, April 1, 2000; 154(4): 1627 - 1637. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. F. Goodwin, B. J. Taylor, A. Villella, M. Foss, L. C. Ryner, B. S. Baker, and J. C. Hall Aberrant Splicing and Altered Spatial Expression Patterns in fruitless Mutants of Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, February 1, 2000; 154(2): 725 - 745. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. S. Hatton, J. J. Eloranta, L. M. Figueiredo, Y. Takagaki, J. L. Manley, and K. O'Hare The Drosophila homologue of the 64 kDa subunit of cleavage stimulation factor interacts with the 77 kDa subunit encoded by the suppressor of forked gene Nucleic Acids Res., January 15, 2000; 28(2): 520 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ferveur, K. Stortkuhl, R. Stocker, and R. Greenspan Genetic feminization of brain structures and changed sexual orientation in male Drosophila Science, February 10, 1995; 267(5199): 902 - 905. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Taylor and L. Knittel Sex-specific differentiation of a male-specific abdominal muscle, the Muscle of Lawrence, is abnormal in hydroxyurea-treated and in fruitless male flies Development, January 9, 1995; 121(9): 3079 - 3088. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hall The mating of a fly Science, June 17, 1994; 264(5166): 1702 - 1714. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||






