| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Genetics, Vol 121, 723-737, Copyright © 1989
INVESTIGATIONS |
R. K. Herman and C. K. Kari
Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108
Twelve new X chromosome duplications were identified and characterized. Eight are translocated to autosomal sites near four different telomeres, and four are free. Ten include unc-1(+), which in wild type is near the left end of the X chromosome, and two of these, mnDp72(X;IV) and mnDp73(X;f), extend rightward past dpy-3. Both mnDp72 and mnDp73 recombined with the one X chromosome in males in the unc-1-dpy-3 interval at a frequency 15- to 30-fold higher than was observed for X-X recombination in hermaphrodites in the same interval. Recombinant duplications and recombinant X chromosomes were both recovered. Recombination with the X chromosome in the unc-1-dpy-3 interval was also detected for five other unc-1(+) duplications, even though their right breakpoints lie within the interval. In hermaphrodites, mnDp72 and mnDp73 promoted meiotic X nondisjunction and recombined with an X chromosome in the unc-1-dpy-3 interval at frequencies comparable to that found for X-X recombination; mnDp72(X;IV) also promoted trisomy for chromosome IV. A mutation in him-8 IV was identified that severely reduced recombination between the two X chromosomes in hermaphrodites and between mnDp73 and the X chromosome in males. Recombination between the X chromosome and duplications of either the right end of the X or a region near but not including the left end was rare. We suggest that the X chromosome has one or more elements near its left end that promote meiotic chromosome pairing.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Martinez-Perez and A. M. Villeneuve HTP-1-dependent constraints coordinate homolog pairing and synapsis and promote chiasma formation during C. elegans meiosis Genes & Dev., November 15, 2005; 19(22): 2727 - 2743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hammarlund, M. W. Davis, H. Nguyen, D. Dayton, and E. M. Jorgensen Heterozygous Insertions Alter Crossover Distribution but Allow Crossover Interference in Caenorhabditis elegans Genetics, November 1, 2005; 171(3): 1047 - 1056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Nabeshima, A. M. Villeneuve, and K. J. Hillers Chromosome-Wide Regulation of Meiotic Crossover Formation in Caenorhabditis elegans Requires Properly Assembled Chromosome Axes Genetics, November 1, 2004; 168(3): 1275 - 1292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S.-R. Pepper, D. J. Killian, and E. J. A. Hubbard Genetic Analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans glp-1 Mutants Suggests Receptor Interaction or Competition Genetics, January 1, 2003; 163(1): 115 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Meneely, A. F. Farago, and T. M. Kauffman Crossover Distribution and High Interference for Both the X Chromosome and an Autosome During Oogenesis and Spermatogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans Genetics, November 1, 2002; 162(3): 1169 - 1177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Carmi and B. J. Meyer The Primary Sex Determination Signal of Caenorhabditis elegans Genetics, July 1, 1999; 152(3): 999 - 1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |