- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Lynch, M.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Lynch, M.
Genetics, Vol 120, 791-807, Copyright © 1988
INVESTIGATIONS |
Design and Analysis of Experiments on Random Drift and Inbreeding Depression
M. Lynch
Department of Ecology, Ethology, and Evolution, University of Illinois, Champaign, Illinois 61820
While the genetic consequences of inbreeding and small population size are of fundamental importance in many areas of biology, empirical research on these phenomena has proceeded in the absence of a well-developed statistical methodology. The usual approach is to compare observed means and variances with the expectations of Wright's neutral, additive genetic model for quantitative characters. If the observations deviate from the expectations more than can be accounted for by sampling variance of the parameter estimates, the null hypothesis is routinely rejected in favor of alternatives invoking evolutionary forces such as selection or nonadditive gene action. This is a biased procedure because it treats sequential samples from the same populations as independent, and because it ignores the fact that the expectations of the neutral additive genetic model will rarely be realized when only a finite number of lines are studied. Even when genes are perfectly additive and neutral, the variation among the properties of founder populations, the random development of linkage disequilibrium within lines, and the variance in inbreeding between lines reduce the likelihood that Wright's expectations will be realized in any particular set of lines. Under most experimental designs, these sources of variation are much too large to be ignored. Formulas are presented for the variance-covariance structure of the realized within- and between-line variance under the neutral additive genetic model. These results are then used to develop statistical tests for detecting the operation of selection and/or inbreeding depression in small populations. A number of recommendations are made for the optimal design of experiments on drift and inbreeding, and a method is suggested for the correction of data for general environmental effects. In general, it appears that we can best understand the response of populations to inbreeding and finite population size by studying a very large number (>100) of self-fertilizing or full-sib mated lines in parallel with one or more stable control populations.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  B. van Heerwaarden, Y. Willi, T. N. Kristensen, and A. A. Hoffmann Population Bottlenecks Increase Additive Genetic Variance But Do Not Break a Selection Limit in Rain Forest Drosophila Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 2135 - 2146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. M. Wardyn, J. W. Edwards, and K. R. Lamkey The Genetic Structure of a Maize Population: The Role of Dominance Crop Sci., March 1, 2007; 47(2): 467 - 474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Croquet, P. Mayeres, A. Gillon, H. Hammami, H. Soyeurt, S. Vanderick, and N. Gengler Linear and Curvilinear Effects of Inbreeding on Production Traits for Walloon Holstein Cows J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2007; 90(1): 465 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. R. Swindell and J. L. Bouzat Inbreeding Depression and Male Survivorship in Drosophila: Implications for Senescence Theory Genetics, January 1, 2006; 172(1): 317 - 327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. K. Kelly Epistasis in Monkeyflowers Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 1917 - 1931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W. Edwards and K. R. Lamkey Dominance and Genetic Drift: Predicted Effects of Population Subdivision in a Maize Population Crop Sci., November 1, 2003; 43(6): 2006 - 2017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W. Edwards and K. R. Lamkey Quantitative Genetics of Inbreeding in a Synthetic Maize Population Crop Sci., July 1, 2002; 42(4): 1094 - 1104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J. Welch and D. Waxman Nonequivalent Loci and the Distribution of Mutant Effects Genetics, June 1, 2002; 161(2): 897 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. C. Phillips, M. C. Whitlock, and K. Fowler Inbreeding Changes the Shape of the Genetic Covariance Matrix in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, July 1, 2001; 158(3): 1137 - 1145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. M. Sheridan and D. N. Karowe Inbreeding, outbreeding, and heterosis in the yellow pitcher plant, Sarracenia flava (Sarraceniaceae), in Virginia Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2000; 87(11): 1628 - 1633. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. D. Pletcher, D. Houle, and J. W. Curtsinger The Evolution of Age-Specific Mortality Rates in Drosophila melanogaster: Genetic Divergence Among Unselected Lines Genetics, October 1, 1999; 153(2): 813 - 823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. C. Whitlock and K. Fowler The Changes in Genetic and Environmental Variance With Inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, May 1, 1999; 152(1): 345 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Wang, A. Caballero, P. D. Keightley, and W. G. Hill Bottleneck Effect on Genetic Variance: A Theoretical Investigation of the Role of Dominance Genetics, September 1, 1998; 150(1): 435 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|