Genetics, Vol 120, 181-198, Copyright © 1988

INVESTIGATIONS

Dosage-Dependent Modifiers of Position Effect Variegation in Drosophila and a Mass Action Model That Explains Their Effect

J. Locke, M. A. Kotarski and K. D. Tartof
Institute for Cancer Research, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111

Twelve dominant enhancers of position effect variegation, representing four loci on the second and third chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster, have been induced by P-element mutagenesis. Instead of simple transposon insertions, seven of these mutations are cytologically visible duplications and three are deficiencies. The duplications define two distinct regions, each coinciding with a locus that also behaves as a dominant haplo-dependent suppressor of variegation. Conversely, two of the deficiencies overlap with a region that contains a haplo-dependent enhancer of variegation while duplications of this same region act to suppress variegation. The third deficiency defines another haplo-dependent enhancer. These data indicate that loci capable of modifying variegation do so in an antipodal fashion through changes in the wild-type gene copy number and may be divided into two reciprocally acting classes. Class I modifiers enhance variegation when duplicated or suppress variegation when deficient. Class II modifiers enhance when deficient but suppress when duplicated. From our data, and those of others, we propose that in Drosophila there are about 20 to 30 dominant loci that modify variegation. Most appear to be of the class I type whereas only two class II modifiers have been identified so far. From these observations we put forth a model, based on the law of mass action, for understanding how such suppressor-enhancer loci function. We propose that each class I modifier codes for a structural protein component of heterochromatin and their effects on variegation are a consequence of their dosage dependent influence on the extent of the assembly of heterochromatin at the chromosomal site of the position effect. It is further proposed that class II modifiers may inhibit the class I products directly, bind to hypothetical termination sites that define heterochromatin boundaries or promote euchromatin formation. Consistent with our mass action model we find that combining two enhancers together produce additive and not epistatic effects. Also, since different enhancers have different relative strengths on different variegating mutants, we suggest that heterochromatic domains are constructed by a combinatorial association of proteins. The mass action model proposed here is of general significance for any assembly driven reaction and has implications for understanding a wide variety of biological phenomena. It may explain, for instance, how changes in gene dosage of such developmentally significant loci as runt, fushi tarazu, Suppressor of Hairless and the regulators of the Polycomb family produce antipodal phenotypes and thereby constitute developmental switches.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. C. Riddle, W. Leung, K. A. Haynes, H. Granok, J. Wuller, and S. C. R. Elgin An Investigation of Heterochromatin Domains on the Fourth Chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, March 1, 2008; 178(3): 1177 - 1191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. S. Weiler E(var)3-9 of Drosophila melanogaster Encodes a Zinc Finger Protein Genetics, September 1, 2007; 177(1): 167 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Haynes, E. Gracheva, and S. C. R. Elgin A Distinct Type of Heterochromatin Within Drosophila melanogaster Chromosome 4 Genetics, March 1, 2007; 175(3): 1539 - 1542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. D. Shaffer, G. Cenci, B. Thompson, G. E. Stephens, E. E. Slawson, K. Adu-Wusu, M. Gatti, and S. C. R. Elgin The Large Isoform of Drosophila melanogaster Heterochromatin Protein 2 Plays a Critical Role in Gene Silencing and Chromosome Structure Genetics, November 1, 2006; 174(3): 1189 - 1204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. C. Whitelaw and E. Whitelaw How lifetimes shape epigenotype within and across generations Hum. Mol. Genet., October 15, 2006; 15(suppl_2): R131 - R137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Caspi and L. Pachter Identification of transposable elements using multiple alignments of related genomes Genome Res., February 1, 2006; 16(2): 260 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Blewitt, N. K. Vickaryous, S. J. Hemley, A. Ashe, T. J. Bruxner, J. I. Preis, R. Arkell, and E. Whitelaw An N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea screen for genes involved in variegation in the mouse PNAS, May 24, 2005; 102(21): 7629 - 7634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Stewart, J. Li, and J. Wong Relationship between Histone H3 Lysine 9 Methylation, Transcription Repression, and Heterochromatin Protein 1 Recruitment Mol. Cell. Biol., April 1, 2005; 25(7): 2525 - 2538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. B. Beckstead, S. S. Ner, K. G. Hales, T. A. Grigliatti, B. S. Baker, and H. J. Bellen Bonus, a Drosophila TIF1 Homolog, Is a Chromatin-Associated Protein That Acts as a Modifier of Position-Effect Variegation Genetics, February 1, 2005; 169(2): 783 - 794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Bushey and J. Locke Mutations in Su(var)205 and Su(var)3-7 Suppress P-Element-Dependent Silencing in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, November 1, 2004; 168(3): 1395 - 1411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Danzer and L. L. Wallrath Mechanisms of HP1-mediated gene silencing in Drosophila Development, August 1, 2004; 131(15): 3571 - 3580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Schmiedeberg, K. Weisshart, S. Diekmann, G. Meyer zu Hoerste, and P. Hemmerich High- and Low-mobility Populations of HP1 in Heterochromatin of Mammalian Cells Mol. Biol. Cell, June 1, 2004; 15(6): 2819 - 2833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. T. Sage and A. K. Csink Heterochromatic Self-Association, a Determinant of Nuclear Organization, Does Not Require Sequence Homology in Drosophila Genetics, November 1, 2003; 165(3): 1183 - 1193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. S. Belyaeva, L. V. Boldyreva, E. I. Volkova, R. A. Nanayev, A. A. Alekseyenko, and I. F. Zhimulev Effect of the Suppressor of Underreplication (SuUR) Gene on Position-Effect Variegation Silencing in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, November 1, 2003; 165(3): 1209 - 1220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Ayyanathan, M. S. Lechner, P. Bell, G. G. Maul, D. C. Schultz, Y. Yamada, K. Tanaka, K. Torigoe, and F. J. Rauscher III Regulated recruitment of HP1 to a euchromatic gene induces mitotically heritable, epigenetic gene silencing: a mammalian cell culture model of gene variegation Genes & Dev., August 1, 2003; 17(15): 1855 - 1869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Boivin, C. Gally, S. Netter, D. Anxolabehere, and S. Ronsseray Telomeric Associated Sequences of Drosophila Recruit Polycomb-Group Proteins in Vivo and Can Induce Pairing-Sensitive Repression Genetics, May 1, 2003; 164(1): 195 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Q. Li, K. R. Peterson, X. Fang, and G. Stamatoyannopoulos Locus control regions Blood, October 16, 2002; 100(9): 3077 - 3086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Donaldson, A. Lui, and G. H. Karpen Modifiers of Terminal Deficiency-Associated Position Effect Variegation in Drosophila Genetics, March 1, 2002; 160(3): 995 - 1009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Shareef, C. King, M. Damaj, R. Badagu, D. W. Huang, and R. Kellum Drosophila Heterochromatin Protein 1 (HP1)/Origin Recognition Complex (ORC) Protein Is Associated with HP1 and ORC and Functions in Heterochromatin-induced Silencing Mol. Biol. Cell, June 1, 2001; 12(6): 1671 - 1685. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Mollaaghababa, L. Sipos, S. Y. K. Tiong, O. Papoulas, J. A. Armstrong, J. W. Tamkun, and W. Bender Mutations in Drosophila heat shock cognate 4 are enhancers of Polycomb PNAS, March 27, 2001; 98(7): 3958 - 3963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Decoville, E. Giacomello, M. Leng, and D. Locker DSP1, an HMG-like Protein, Is Involved in the Regulation of Homeotic Genes Genetics, January 1, 2001; 157(1): 237 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. L. Dula and S. G. Holmes MGA2 and SPT23 Are Modifiers of Transcriptional Silencing in Yeast Genetics, November 1, 2000; 156(3): 933 - 941. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. Mottus, R. E. Sobel, and T. A. Grigliatti Mutational Analysis of a Histone Deacetylase in Drosophila melanogaster: Missense Mutations Suppress Gene Silencing Associated With Position Effect Variegation Genetics, February 1, 2000; 154(2): 657 - 668. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				P. B. Talbert and S. Henikoff A Reexamination of Spreading of Position-Effect Variegation in the white-roughest Region of Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, January 1, 2000; 154(1): 259 - 272. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				T. Zhao and J. C. Eissenberg Phosphorylation of Heterochromatin Protein 1 by Casein Kinase II Is Required for Efficient Heterochromatin Binding in Drosophila J. Biol. Chem., May 21, 1999; 274(21): 15095 - 15100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Boivin and J.-M. Dura In Vivo Chromatin Accessibility Correlates With Gene Silencing in Drosophila Genetics, December 1, 1998; 150(4): 1539 - 1549. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				T. Belenkaya, A. Soldatov, E. Nabirochkina, I. Birjukova, S. Georgieva, and P. Georgiev P-Element Insertion at the polyhomeotic Gene Leads to Formation of a Novel Chimeric Protein That Negatively Regulates yellow Gene Expression in P-Element-Induced Alleles of Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, October 1, 1998; 150(2): 687 - 697. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				U. Bhadra, M. P. Bhadra, and J. A. Birchler Interactions Among Dosage-Dependent Trans-Acting Modifiers of Gene Expression and Position-Effect Variegation in Drosophila Genetics, September 1, 1998; 150(1): 251 - 263. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. C. Motta, N. Landsberger, C. Merli, and G. Badaracco In Vitro Reconstitution of Artemia Satellite Chromatin J. Biol. Chem., July 17, 1998; 273(29): 18028 - 18039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Kyba and H. W. Brock The Drosophila Polycomb Group Protein Psc Contacts ph and Pc through Specific Conserved Domains Mol. Cell. Biol., May 1, 1998; 18(5): 2712 - 2720. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. I. Lamond and W. C. Earnshaw Structure and Function in the Nucleus Science, April 24, 1998; 280(5363): 547 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				G. L. Sass and S. Henikoff Comparative Analysis of Position–Effect Variegation Mutations in Drosophila melanogaster Delineates the Targets of Modifiers Genetics, February 1, 1998; 148(2): 733 - 742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K Stankunas, J Berger, C Ruse, D. Sinclair, F Randazzo, and H. Brock The enhancer of polycomb gene of Drosophila encodes a chromatin protein conserved in yeast and mammals Development, January 10, 1998; 125(20): 4055 - 4066. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Lu, J Ma, and J. Eissenberg Developmental regulation of heterochromatin-mediated gene silencing in Drosophila Development, January 6, 1998; 125(12): 2223 - 2234. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Sinclair, T. Milne, J. Hodgson, J Shellard, C. Salinas, M Kyba, F Randazzo, and H. Brock The Additional sex combs gene of Drosophila encodes a chromatin protein that binds to shared and unique Polycomb group sites on polytene chromosomes Development, January 4, 1998; 125(7): 1207 - 1216. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Hudson, S. Podos, K Keith, S. Simpson, and E. Ferguson The Drosophila Medea gene is required downstream of dpp and encodes a functional homolog of human Smad4 Development, January 4, 1998; 125(8): 1407 - 1420. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Enhancer of Polycomb Is a Suppressor of Position-Effect Variegation in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, January 1, 1998; 148(1): 211 - 220.

				A Busturia, C. Wightman, and S Sakonju A silencer is required for maintenance of transcriptional repression throughout Drosophila development Development, January 11, 1997; 124(21): 4343 - 4350. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S Strahl-Bolsinger, A Hecht, K Luo, and M Grunstein SIR2 and SIR4 interactions differ in core and extended telomeric heterochromatin in yeast. Genes & Dev., January 1, 1997; 11(1): 83 - 93. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y W Jiang and D J Stillman Epigenetic effects on yeast transcription caused by mutations in an actin-related protein present in the nucleus. Genes & Dev., March 1, 1996; 10(5): 604 - 619. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Carrington and R. Jones The Drosophila Enhancer of zeste gene encodes a chromosomal protein: examination of wild-type and mutant protein distribution Development, January 12, 1996; 122(12): 4073 - 4083. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L L Wallrath and S C Elgin Position effect variegation in Drosophila is associated with an altered chromatin structure. Genes & Dev., May 15, 1995; 9(10): 1263 - 1277. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R Kellum and B. Alberts Heterochromatin protein 1 is required for correct chromosome segregation in Drosophila embryos J. Cell Sci., January 4, 1995; 108(4): 1419 - 1431. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C Brou, F Logeat, M Lecourtois, J Vandekerckhove, P Kourilsky, F Schweisguth, and A Israel Inhibition of the DNA-binding activity of Drosophila suppressor of hairless and of its human homolog, KBF2/RBP-J kappa, by direct protein-protein interaction with Drosophila hairless. Genes & Dev., October 15, 1994; 8(20): 2491 - 2503. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Singh Molecular mechanisms of cellular determination: their relation to chromatin structure and parental imprinting J. Cell Sci., January 10, 1994; 107(10): 2653 - 2668. [PDF]

				M O Fauvarque and J M Dura polyhomeotic regulatory sequences induce developmental regulator-dependent variegation and targeted P-element insertions in Drosophila. Genes & Dev., August 1, 1993; 7(8): 1508 - 1520. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Martin and P. Adler The Polycomb group gene Posterior Sex Combs encodes a chromosomal protein Development, January 2, 1993; 117(2): 641 - 655. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S Messmer, A Franke, and R Paro Analysis of the functional role of the Polycomb chromo domain in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes & Dev., July 1, 1992; 6(7): 1241 - 1254. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M DeCamillis, N S Cheng, D Pierre, and H W Brock The polyhomeotic gene of Drosophila encodes a chromatin protein that shares polytene chromosome-binding sites with Polycomb. Genes & Dev., February 1, 1992; 6(2): 223 - 232. [Abstract] [PDF]