- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Choudhary, M.
- Articles by Singh, R. S.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Choudhary, M.
- Articles by Singh, R. S.
A Comprehensive Study of Genic Variation in Natural Populations of Drosophila melanogaster. III. Variations in Genetic Structure and Their Causes Between Drosophila melanogaster and Its Sibling Species Drosophila simulans
M. Choudhary 1 and Rama S. Singh 1
1 Department of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario
L8S 4K1, Canada
The natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans were compared for their genetic structure. A total of 114 gene-protein loci were studied in four mainland (from Europe and Africa) and an island (Seychelle) populations of D. simulans and the results were compared with those obtained on the same set of homologous loci in fifteen worldwide populations of D. melanogaster. The main results are as follows: (1) D. melanogaster shows a significantly higher proportion of loci polymorphic than D. simulans (52% vs. 39%, P<0.05), (2) both species have similar mean heterozygosity and mean number of alleles per locus, (3) the two species share some highly polymorphic loci but they do not share loci that show high geographic differentiation, and (4) D. simulans shows significantly less geographic differentiation than D. melanogaster. The differences in genetic differentiation between the two species are limited to loci located on the X and second chromosomes only; loci on the third chromosome show similar level of geographic differentiation in both species. These two species have previously been shown to differ in their pattern of variation for chromosomal polymorphisms, quantitative and physiological characters, two-dimensional electrophoretic (2DE) proteins, middle repetitive DNA and mitochondrial DNA. Variation in niche-widths and/or genetic "strategies" of adaptation appear to be the main causes of differences in the genetic structure of these two species.
Submitted on March 2, 1987Accepted on August 22, 1987
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  G. N. Goulielmos, N. Cosmidis, M. E. Theodorakopoulou, M. Loukas, and E. Zouros Tracing the History of an Enzyme Polymorphism: The Case of Alcohol Dehydrogenase-2 (Adh-2) of the Olive Fruit Fly Bactrocera oleae Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2003; 20(3): 293 - 306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. J. Begun and P. Whitley Molecular Population Genetics of Xdh and the Evolution of Base Composition in Drosophila Genetics, December 1, 2002; 162(4): 1725 - 1735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. T. Hamblin and M. Veuille Population Structure Among African and Derived Populations of Drosophila simulans: Evidence for Ancient Subdivision and Recent Admixture Genetics, September 1, 1999; 153(1): 305 - 317. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. D. Irvin, K. A. Wetterstrand, C. M. Hutter, and C. F. Aquadro Genetic Variation and Differentiation at Microsatellite Loci in Drosophila simulans: Evidence for Founder Effects in New World Populations Genetics, October 1, 1998; 150(2): 777 - 790. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|