- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Keightley, P. D.
- Articles by Hill, W. G.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Keightley, P. D.
- Articles by Hill, W. G.
Directional Selection and Variation in Finite Populations
Peter D. Keightley 1 and William G. Hill 1
1 Institute of Animal Genetics, University of Edinburgh, West
Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JN, Scotland
Predictions are made of the equilibrium genetic variances and responses in a metric trait under the joint effects of directional selection, mutation and linkage in a finite population. The "infinitesimal model" is analyzed as the limiting case of many mutants of very small effect, otherwise Monte Carlo simulation is used. If the effects of mutant genes on the trait are symmetrically distributed and they are unlinked, the variance of mutant effects is not an important parameter. If the distribution is skewed, unless effects or the population size is small, the proportion of mutants that have increasing effect is the critical parameter. With linkage the distribution of genotypic values in the population becomes skewed downward and the equilibrium genetic variance and response are smaller as disequilibrium becomes important. Linkage effects are greater when the mutational variance is contributed by many genes of small effect than few of large effect, and are greater when the majority of mutants increase rather than decrease the trait because genes that are of large effect or are deleterious do not segregate for long. The most likely conditions for "Muller's ratchet" are investigated.
Submitted on April 12, 1987Accepted on July 16, 1987
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X.-S. Zhang and W. G. Hill The Anomalous Effects of Biased Mutation Revisited: Mean-Optimum Deviation and Apparent Directional Selection Under Stabilizing Selection Genetics, June 1, 2008; 179(2): 1135 - 1141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. Keightley and A. Eyre-Walker Joint Inference of the Distribution of Fitness Effects of Deleterious Mutations and Population Demography Based on Nucleotide Polymorphism Frequencies Genetics, December 1, 2007; 177(4): 2251 - 2261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X.-S. Zhang and W. G. Hill Predictions of Patterns of Response to Artificial Selection in Lines Derived From Natural Populations Genetics, January 1, 2005; 169(1): 411 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Bijma and J. A. Woolliams Prediction of Rates of Inbreeding in Populations Selected on Best Linear Unbiased Prediction of Breeding Value Genetics, September 1, 2000; 156(1): 361 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Pletcher, D. Houle, and J. W. Curtsinger The Evolution of Age-Specific Mortality Rates in Drosophila melanogaster: Genetic Divergence Among Unselected Lines Genetics, October 1, 1999; 153(2): 813 - 823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Waxman and J. R. Peck Sex and Adaptation in a Changing Environment Genetics, October 1, 1999; 153(2): 1041 - 1053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
