X-4 Translocations and Meiotic Drive in Drosophila melanogaster Males: Role of Sex Chromosome Pairing

1 Department of Biology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093

Males carrying certain X-4 translocations exhibit strongly skewed sperm recovery ratios. The XP4D half of the translocation disjoins regularly from the Y chromosome and the 4PXD half disjoins regularly from the normal 4. Yet the smaller member of each bivalent is recovered in excess of its pairing partner, apparently due to differential gametic lethality. Chromosome recovery probabilities are multiplicative; the viability of each genotype is the product of the recovery probability of its component chromosomes. Meiotic drive can also be caused by deficiency for X heterochromatin. In(1)sc4Lsc8R males show the same size dependent chromosome recoveries and multiplicative recovery probabilities found in T(1;4)BS males. Meiotic drive in In(1)sc4Lsc8R males has been shown to be due to X-Y pairing failure. Although pairing is regular in the T(X;4) males, the striking phenotypic parallels suggest a common explanation. The experiments described below show that the two phenomena are, in fact, one and the same. X-4 translocations are shown to have the same effect on recovery of independently assorting chromosomes as does In(1)sc4Lsc8R. Addition of pairing sites to the 4PXD half of the translocation eliminates drive. A common explanation—failure of the distal euchromatic portion of the X chromosome to participate in X:Y meiotic pairing—is suggested as the cause for drive. The effect of X chromosome breakpoint on X-4 translocation induced meiotic drive is investigated. It is found that translocations with breakpoints distal to 13C on the salivary map do not cause drive while translocations broken proximal to 13C cause drive. The level of drive is related to the position of the breakpoint—the more proximal the breakpoint the greater the drive.

Submitted on October 27, 1986
Accepted on March 19, 1987




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. Boschi, M. Belloni, and L. G. Robbins
Genetic Evidence That Nonhomologous Disjunction and Meiotic Drive Are Properties of Wild-Type Drosophila melanogaster Male Meiosis
Genetics, January 1, 2006; 172(1): 305 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. Belloni, P. Tritto, M. P. Bozzetti, G. Palumbo, and L. G. Robbins
Does Stellate Cause Meiotic Drive in Drosophila melanogaster?
Genetics, August 1, 2002; 161(4): 1551 - 1559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. E. Tomkiel, B. T. Wakimoto, and A. Briscoe , Jr.
The teflon Gene Is Required for Maintenance of Autosomal Homolog Pairing at Meiosis I in Male Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, January 1, 2001; 157(1): 273 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
L. G. Robbins
Are Unpaired Chromosomes Spermicidal?: A Maximum-Likelihood Analysis of Segregation and Meiotic Drive in Drosophila melanogaster Males Deficient for the Ribosomal-DNA
Genetics, January 1, 1999; 151(1): 251 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text]