- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Wulff, D. L.
- Articles by Mahoney, M. E.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Wulff, D. L.
- Articles by Mahoney, M. E.
Cross-Specificities Between cII-like Proteins and pRE-like Promoters of Lambdoid Bacteriophages
Daniel L. Wulff 1 and Michael E. Mahoney 1
1 Department of Biological Sciences, State University of New
York, Albany, New York 12222
We have investigated the activation of transcription from the
pRE promoters of phages
, 21 and P22 by the
and 21 cII proteins and the P22 c1 (cII-like) protein,
using an in vivo system in which cII protein from a derepressed
prophage activates transcription from a pRE DNA fragment
on a multicopy plasmid. We find that each protein is highly specific for its
own cognate pRE promoter, although measureable cross-reactions
are observed. The primary recognition sequence for cII protein on
pRE is a pair of TTGC repeat sequences in the sequence 5'-TTGCN
6TTGC-3' at the -35 region of the promoter. This same sequence
is found in 21 pRE, while P22 pRE has
the sequence 5'-TTGCN6TTGT-3', which is the same as
that of
ctr1, a pRE+ variant
of
.
ctr1 pRE is half as active as
+ pRE when assayed with either the
cII or the P22 c1 proteins. Therefore, the single base change
in the P22 repeat sequence cannot explain why the P22 c1 protein
is much more active with P22 pRE than
p
RE. The dya5 mutation, a G
A change at position -43
of pRE, makes pRE a stronger promoter
when assayed with either the
or 21 cII proteins or the P22
c1 protein. We conclude that efficient activation of a cII-dependent
promoter by a cII protein requires sequence information in addition
to the TTGC repeat sequences. We do not know the characteristics of the proteins
which are responsible for the specificity of each protein for its own cognate
promoter. However,
dya8, which has a Glu27
Lys alteration
in the
cII protein and a cII+ phenotype,
results in a mutant cII protein that is much more highly specific
than wild-type cII protein for its own cognate
p
RE promoter. This is especially remarkable because the dya8
amino acid alteration makes the helix-2 region (the region of the protein
predicted to make contact with the phosphodiester backbone of the DNA) of
cII protein conform exactly with the helix-2 region of the P22 c1
protein in both charge and charge distribution.
Accepted on December 15, 1986
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. B. Datta, S. Panjikar, M. S. Weiss, P. Chakrabarti, and P. Parrack Structure of {lambda} CII: Implications for recognition of direct-repeat DNA by an unusual tetrameric organization PNAS, August 9, 2005; 102(32): 11242 - 11247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y S Ho, M E Mahoney, D L Wulff, and M Rosenberg Identification of the DNA binding domain of the phage lambda cII transcriptional activator and the direct correlation of cII protein stability with its oligomeric forms. Genes & Dev., February 1, 1988; 2(2): 184 - 195. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||

