Persistence of Tandem Arrays: Implications for Satellite and Simple-Sequence DNAs

James Bruce Walsh ¹

¹ Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721

Recombination processes acting on tandem arrays are suggested here to have probable intrinsic biases, producing an expected net decrease in array size following each event, in contrast to previous models which assume no net change in array size. We examine the implications of this by modeling copy number dynamics in a tandem array under the joint interactions of sister-strand unequal crossing over (rate per generation per copy) and intrastrand recombination resulting in deletion (rate per generation per copy). Assuming no gene amplification or selection, the expected mean persistence time of an array starting with z excess copies (i.e., array size z + 1) is z(1 + /) recombinational events. Nontrivial equilibrium distributions of array sizes exist when gene amplification or certain forms of selection are considered. We characterize the equilibrium distribution for both a simple model of gene amplification and under the assumption that selection imposes a minimal array size, n. For the latter case, n + 1/ is an upper bound for mean array size under fairly general conditions, where (=2/) is the scaled deletion rate. Further, the distribution of excess copies over n is bounded above by a geometric distribution with parameter /(1 + ). Tandem arrays are unlikely to be greatly expanded by unequal crossing over unless << 1, implying that other mechanisms, such as gene amplification, are likely important in the evolution of large arrays. Thus unequal crossing over, by itself, is likely insufficient to account for satellite DNA.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. E. Hall, S. Luo, A. E. Hall, and D. Preuss Differential Rates of Local and Global Homogenization in Centromere Satellites From Arabidopsis Relatives Genetics, August 1, 2005; 170(4): 1913 - 1927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. L. Tek, J. Song, J. Macas, and J. Jiang Sobo, a Recently Amplified Satellite Repeat of Potato, and Its Implications for the Origin of Tandemly Repeated Sequences Genetics, July 1, 2005; 170(3): 1231 - 1238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Perez, F. Cruz, and P. Presa Distribution Properties of Polymononucleotide Repeats in Molluscan Genomes J. Hered., January 1, 2005; 96(1): 40 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Sainudiin, R. T. Durrett, C. F. Aquadro, and R. Nielsen Microsatellite Mutation Models: Insights From a Comparison of Humans and Chimpanzees Genetics, September 1, 2004; 168(1): 383 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. J. Parkin and R. K. Butlin Within- and Between-Individual Sequence Variation Among ITS1 Copies in the Meadow Grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus Indicates Frequent Intrachromosomal Gene Conversion Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2004; 21(8): 1595 - 1601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Zhang and B. S. Gaut Does Recombination Shape the Distribution and Evolution of Tandemly Arrayed Genes (TAGs) in the Arabidopsis thaliana Genome? Genome Res., December 1, 2003; 13(12): 2533 - 2540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Walsh Estimating the Time to the Most Recent Common Ancestor for the Y chromosome or Mitochondrial DNA for a Pair of Individuals Genetics, June 1, 2001; 158(2): 897 - 912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Ogata and H. Morino Elongation of repetitive DNA by DNA polymerase from a hyperthermophilic bacterium Thermus thermophilus Nucleic Acids Res., October 15, 2000; 28(20): 3999 - 4004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. N. Hiatt, E. K. Kentner, and R. K. Dawe Independently Regulated Neocentromere Activity of Two Classes of Tandem Repeat Arrays PLANT CELL, February 1, 2002; 14(2): 407 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]