Use of P-Element-Mediated Transformation to Identify the Molecular Basis of Naturally Occurring Variants Affecting Adh Expression in Drosophila melanogaster

Cathy C. Laurie-Ahlberg ¹ and Lynn F. Stam ¹

¹ Department of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695

The purpose of the work reported here is to identify the molecular basis of the difference in level of expression between the polymorphic Slow and Fast alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) alleles in Drosophila melanogaster . Previous studies have shown that Fast lines typically have a two- to threefold higher activity level than Slow lines and they also have a substantially higher level of ADH-protein (estimated immunologically). The results of a restriction fragment length polymorphism study in relation to ADH activity variation had previously suggested that the difference in Adh expression between allozymes might not be due entirely to the amino acid replacement substitution, but could be due in part to linkage disequilibrium with a regulatory site polymorphism. Here we describe an approach that makes use of P-element-mediated transformation in order to identify the nucleotide substitution(s) responsible for this difference in ADH level. This approach consists of generating recombinants in vitro between Adh region clones derived from a typical Slow/Fast pair of alleles and then testing for the effects of particular restriction fragments on expression in vivo by transformation. Using this approach, the effect on both ADH activity and ADH-protein level clearly maps to a 2.3-kb restriction fragment that includes all of the Adh coding sequence and some intron and 3' flanking sequence, but excludes all of the 5' flanking sequence of the distal (adult) transcriptional unit. Comparison of Kreitman's DNA sequences for this fragment from several Slow and Fast alleles showing the typical difference in activity level shows that only three nucleotide substitutions distinguish all Fast from all Slow alleles. Thus, it is likely that one or more of these substitutions causes the major difference in Adh expression between allozymic classes. One of these substitutions is, of course, the Slow/Fast amino acid replacement substitution (at 1490) while the other two are nearby third position silent substitutions (at 1443 and 1527). A quantiative analysis of variation among transformant stocks shows that the P-element transformation approach can be used to localize even relatively small effects on gene expression (on the order of 20%).

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. J. Greenberg and C.-I Wu Molecular Genetics of Natural Populations Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2006; 23(5): 883 - 886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Parsch Functional Analysis of Drosophila melanogaster Gene Regulatory Sequences by Transgene Coplacement Genetics, September 1, 2004; 168(1): 559 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. F. Baines, J. Parsch, and W. Stephan Pleiotropic Effect of Disrupting a Conserved Sequence Involved in a Long-Range Compensatory Interaction in the Drosophila Adh Gene Genetics, January 1, 2004; 166(1): 237 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Greenberg, J. R. Moran, J. A. Coyne, and C.-I Wu Ecological Adaptation During Incipient Speciation Revealed by Precise Gene Replacement Science, December 5, 2003; 302(5651): 1754 - 1757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Chen and W. Stephan Compensatory evolution of a precursor messenger RNA secondary structure in the Drosophila melanogaster Adh gene PNAS, September 30, 2003; 100(20): 11499 - 11504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. A. Odgers, C. F. Aquadro, C. W. Coppin, M. J. Healy, and J. G. Oakeshott Nucleotide Polymorphism in the Est6 Promoter, Which Is Widespread in Derived Populations of Drosophila melanogaster, Changes the Level of Esterase 6 Expressed in the Male Ejaculatory Duct Genetics, October 1, 2002; 162(2): 785 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Parsch, J. A. Russell, I. Beerman, D. L. Hartl, and W. Stephan Deletion of a Conserved Regulatory Element in the Drosophila Adh Gene Leads to Increased Alcohol Dehydrogenase Activity but Also Delays Development Genetics, September 1, 2000; 156(1): 219 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				U. Bhadra, M. Pal-Bhadra, and J. A. Birchler Role of the male specific lethal (msl) Genes in Modifying the Effects of Sex Chromosomal Dosage in Drosophila Genetics, May 1, 1999; 152(1): 249 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. Parsch, W. Stephan, and S. Tanda A Highly Conserved Sequence in the 3'-Untranslated Region of the Drosophila Adh Gene Plays a Functional Role in Adh Expression Genetics, February 1, 1999; 151(2): 667 - 674. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. L. Siegal and D. L. Hartl An experimental test for lineage-specific position effects on alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) genes in Drosophila PNAS, December 22, 1998; 95(26): 15513 - 15518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Parsch, S. Tanda, and W. Stephan Site-directed mutations reveal long-range compensatory interactions in the Adh gene of Drosophila melanogaster PNAS, February 4, 1997; 94(3): 928 - 933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T D Dreesen, S Henikoff, and K Loughney A pairing-sensitive element that mediates trans-inactivation is associated with the Drosophila brown gene. Genes & Dev., March 1, 1991; 5(3): 331 - 340. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L Cooley, R Kelley, and A Spradling Insertional mutagenesis of the Drosophila genome with single P elements Science, March 4, 1988; 239(4844): 1121 - 1128. [Abstract] [PDF]