- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Zeng, Z.-B.
- Articles by Hill, W. G.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Zeng, Z.-B.
- Articles by Hill, W. G.
THE SELECTION LIMIT DUE TO THE CONFLICT BETWEEN TRUNCATION AND STABILIZING SELECTION WITH MUTATION
Zhao-Bang Zeng 1 and William G. Hill 1
1 Institute of Animal Genetics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
EH9 3JN, Scotland
Long-term selection response could slow down from a decline in
genetic variance or in selection differential or both. A model of conflict
between truncation and stabilizing selection in infinite population size is
analysed in terms of the reduction in selection differential. Under the assumption
of a normal phenotypic distribution, the limit to selection is found to be
a function of
, the intensity of truncation selection,
2, a measure of the intensity of stabilizing selection, and
2, the phenotypic variance of the character. The maintenance of genetic
variation at this limit is also analyzed in terms of mutation-selection balance
by the use of the "House-of-cards" approximation. It is found that truncation
selection can substantially reduce the equilibrium genetic variance below
that when only stabilizing selection is acting, and the proportional reduction
in variance is greatest when the selection is very weak. When truncation selection
is strong, any further increase in the strength of selection has little further
influence on the variance. It appears that this mutation-selection balance
is insufficient to account for the high levels of genetic variation observed
in many long-term selection experiments.
Accepted on August 25, 1986