- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Bryant, E. H.
- Articles by McCommas, S. A.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Bryant, E. H.
- Articles by McCommas, S. A.
MORPHOMETRIC DIFFERENTIATION AMONG EXPERIMENTAL LINES OF THE HOUSEFLY IN RELATION TO A BOTTLENECK
Edwin H. Bryant 1, Lisa M. Combs 1, and Steven A. McCommas 1
1 Department of Biology, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
77004
Differentiation in morphometric traits among experimental populations of the housefly subjected to an experimental bottleneck was examined for replicate lines founded with one, four or 16 pairs of flies. Differentiation among lines within a bottleneck size was significantly greater than predicted by drift in relation to the additive genetic variation for these traits within the founding population. Two models of nonadditive genetic variance were investigated to interpret these results, one involving dominance of allelic effects within loci and another incorporating multiplicative epistasis. Both models generated more variation among lines as a direct result of sampling during the bottleneck than predicted by a model with additive gene action. The pattern of differentiation among our experimental lines in relation to these models conformed more to the model incorporating epistasis. Nevertheless, it may be difficult to distinguish differentiation among lines occurring during a bottleneck as a result of nonadditive gene action from that caused by diversifying selection among lines after the bottleneck.
Submitted on December 2, 1985Accepted on August 29, 1986
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. R. Swindell and J. L. Bouzat Inbreeding Depression and Male Survivorship in Drosophila: Implications for Senescence Theory Genetics, January 1, 2006; 172(1): 317 - 327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Edwards and K. R. Lamkey Dominance and Genetic Drift: Predicted Effects of Population Subdivision in a Maize Population Crop Sci., November 1, 2003; 43(6): 2006 - 2017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

