- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Bryant, E. H.
- Articles by Combs, L. M.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Bryant, E. H.
- Articles by Combs, L. M.
THE EFFECT OF AN EXPERIMENTAL BOTTLENECK UPON QUANTITATIVE GENETIC VARIATION IN THE HOUSEFLY
Edwin H. Bryant 1, Steven A. McCommas 1, and Lisa M. Combs 1
1 Department of Biology, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
77004
Effects of a population bottleneck (founder-flush cycle) upon quantitative genetic variation of morphometric traits were examined in replicated experimental lines of the housefly founded with one, four or 16 pairs of flies. Heritability and additive genetic variances for eight morphometric traits generally increased as a result of the bottleneck, but the pattern of increase among bottleneck sizes differed among traits. Principal axes of the additive genetic correlation matrix for the control line yielded two suites of traits, one associated with general body size and another set largely independent of body size. In the former set containing five of the traits, additive genetic variance was greatest in the bottleneck size of four pairs, whereas in the latter set of two traits the largest additive genetic variance occurred in the smallest bottleneck size of one pair. One trait exhibited changes in additive genetic variance intermediate between these two major responses. These results were inconsistent with models of additive effects of alleles within loci or of additive effects among loci. An observed decline in viability measures and body size in the bottleneck lines also indicated that there was nonadditivity of allelic effects for these traits. Several possible nonadditive models were explored that increased additive genetic variance as a result of a bottleneck. These included a model with complete dominance, a model with overdominance and a model incorporating multiplicative epistasis.
Submitted on December 2, 1985Accepted on August 29, 1986
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. van Heerwaarden, Y. Willi, T. N. Kristensen, and A. A. Hoffmann Population Bottlenecks Increase Additive Genetic Variance But Do Not Break a Selection Limit in Rain Forest Drosophila Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 2135 - 2146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. H. Briggs and I. L. Goldman Genetic Variation and Selection Response in Model Breeding Populations of Brassica rapa Following a Diversity Bottleneck Genetics, January 1, 2006; 172(1): 457 - 465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Tabanao and R. Bernardo Genetic Variation in Maize Breeding Populations with Different Numbers of Parents Crop Sci., September 23, 2005; 45(6): 2301 - 2306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Prendergast, R. A. Renstrom, and R. J. Nelson Genetic Analyses of a Seasonal Interval Timer J Biol Rhythms, August 1, 2004; 19(4): 298 - 311. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X.-S. Zhang, J. Wang, and W. G. Hill Redistribution of Gene Frequency and Changes of Genetic Variation Following a Bottleneck in Population Size Genetics, July 1, 2004; 167(3): 1475 - 1492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Yu and R. Bernardo Changes in Genetic Variance during Advanced Cycle Breeding in Maize Crop Sci., March 1, 2004; 44(2): 405 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Edwards and K. R. Lamkey Dominance and Genetic Drift: Predicted Effects of Population Subdivision in a Maize Population Crop Sci., November 1, 2003; 43(6): 2006 - 2017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. L. Carson Mate choice theory and the mode of selection in sexual populations PNAS, May 27, 2003; 100(11): 6584 - 6587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Ungerer, C. R. Linder, and L. H. Rieseberg Effects of Genetic Background on Response to Selection in Experimental Populations of Arabidopsis thaliana Genetics, January 1, 2003; 163(1): 277 - 286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. S. Guzman and K. R. Lamkey Effective Population Size and Genetic Variability in the BS11 Maize Population Crop Sci., March 1, 2000; 40(2): 338 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Whitlock and K. Fowler The Changes in Genetic and Environmental Variance With Inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, May 1, 1999; 152(1): 345 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wang, A. Caballero, P. D. Keightley, and W. G. Hill Bottleneck Effect on Genetic Variance: A Theoretical Investigation of the Role of Dominance Genetics, September 1, 1998; 150(1): 435 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R Lande Genetics and demography in biological conservation Science, September 16, 1988; 241(4872): 1455 - 1460. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Lewin The surprising genetics of bottlenecked flies Science, March 13, 1987; 235(4794): 1325 - 1327. [PDF] |
||||




