- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Charlesworth, B.
- Articles by Stephan, W.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Charlesworth, B.
- Articles by Stephan, W.
THE EVOLUTION OF RESTRICTED RECOMBINATION AND THE ACCUMULATION OF REPEATED DNA SEQUENCES
Brian Charlesworth 1, Charles H. Langley 1, and Wolfgang Stephan 1
1 School of Biological Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton
BN1 9QG, England
We suggest hypotheses to account for two major features of chromosomal organization in higher eukaryotes. The first of these is the general restriction of crossing over in the neighborhood of centromeres and telomeres. We propose that this is a consequence of selection for reduced rates of unequal exchange between repeated DNA sequences for which the copy number is subject to stabilizing selection: microtubule binding sites, in the case of centromeres, and the short repeated sequences needed for terminal replication of a linear DNA molecule, in the case of telomeres. An association between proximal crossing over and nondisjunction would also favor the restriction of crossing over near the centromere. The second feature is the association between highly repeated DNA sequences of no obvious functional significance and regions of restricted crossing over. We show that highly repeated sequences are likely to persist longest (over evolutionary time) when crossing over is infrequent. This is because unequal exchange among repeated sequences generates single copy sequences, and a population that becomes fixed for a single copy sequence by drift remains in this state indefinitely (in the absence of gene amplification processes). Increased rates of exchange thus speed up the process of stochastic loss of repeated sequences.
Submitted on April 9, 1985Accepted on December 13, 1985
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Yan, H. Ito, K. Nobuta, S. Ouyang, W. Jin, S. Tian, C. Lu, R.C. Venu, G.-l. Wang, P. J. Green, et al. Genomic and Genetic Characterization of Rice Cen3 Reveals Extensive Transcription and Evolutionary Implications of a Complex Centromere PLANT CELL, September 1, 2006; 18(9): 2123 - 2133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kondo, U. Hornung, I. Nanda, S. Imai, T. Sasaki, A. Shimizu, S. Asakawa, H. Hori, M. Schmid, N. Shimizu, et al. Genomic organization of the sex-determining and adjacent regions of the sex chromosomes of medaka Genome Res., July 1, 2006; 16(7): 815 - 826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Jurka, O. Kohany, A. Pavlicek, V. V. Kapitonov, and M. V. Jurka Duplication, coclustering, and selection of human Alu retrotransposons PNAS, February 3, 2004; 101(5): 1268 - 1272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Zhang and B. S. Gaut Does Recombination Shape the Distribution and Evolution of Tandemly Arrayed Genes (TAGs) in the Arabidopsis thaliana Genome? Genome Res., December 1, 2003; 13(12): 2533 - 2540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. E. Eichler and D. Sankoff Structural Dynamics of Eukaryotic Chromosome Evolution Science, August 8, 2003; 301(5634): 793 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Ogata and H. Morino Elongation of repetitive DNA by DNA polymerase from a hyperthermophilic bacterium Thermus thermophilus Nucleic Acids Res., October 15, 2000; 28(20): 3999 - 4004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. S. Gaut, M. Le Thierry d'Ennequin, A. S. Peek, and M. C. Sawkins Maize as a model for the evolution of plant nuclear genomes PNAS, June 20, 2000; 97(13): 7008 - 7015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. P. Copenhaver, K. Nickel, T. Kuromori, M. Benito, S. Kaul, X. Lin, M. Bevan, G. Murphy, B. Harris, L. D. Parnell, et al. Genetic Definition and Sequence Analysis of Arabidopsis Centromeres Science, December 24, 1999; 286(5449): 2468 - 2474. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Buckler , IV, T. L. Phelps-Durr, C. S. K. Buckler, R. K. Dawe, J. F. Doebley, and T. P. Holtsford Meiotic Drive of Chromosomal Knobs Reshaped the Maize Genome Genetics, September 1, 1999; 153(1): 415 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. T. Dermitzakis, A. G. Clark, C. Batargias, A. Magoulas, and E. Zouros Negative Covariance Suggests Mutation Bias in a Two-Locus Microsatellite System in the Fish Sparus aurata Genetics, December 1, 1998; 150(4): 1567 - 1575. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Mahtani and H. F. Willard Physical and Genetic Mapping of the Human X Chromosome Centromere: Repression of Recombination Genome Res., February 1, 1998; 8(2): 100 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. N. Hiatt, E. K. Kentner, and R. K. Dawe Independently Regulated Neocentromere Activity of Two Classes of Tandem Repeat Arrays PLANT CELL, February 1, 2002; 14(2): 407 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





