- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Fujikawa, K.
- Articles by Kondo, S.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Fujikawa, K.
- Articles by Kondo, S.
DNA REPAIR DEPENDENCE OF SOMATIC MUTAGENESIS OF TRANSPOSON-CAUSED WHITE ALLELES IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER AFTER TREATMENT WITH ALKYLATING AGENTS
Kazuo Fujikawa 1 and Sohei Kondo 2
1 Zoological Institute, Faculty of Sciences, Hiroshima University,
Hiroshima 730
2 Faculty of Medicine, Osaka University, Kita-ku, Osaka 530,
Japan
DNA repair-defective alleles of the mei-9, mei-41, mus-104
and mus-101 loci of Drosophila melanogaster were introduced
into stocks bearing the UZ and SZ marker sets. Males with
the UZ marker set, z1 (zeste allele)
and w+(TE) (genetically unstable white allele
presumably caused by a transposable element), or the SZ marker set,
z1 and w+R (semistable white
allele caused by partial duplication of the w+ locus
plus transposon insert), were exposed to EMS at the first instar. After emergence,
adult males bearing red spots on lemon-yellow eyes were scored as flies with
somatic reversions of w+(TE) or w
+R. The relative mutabilities (relative values of reversion
frequency at an equal EMS dose) of either w+(TE) or
w+R in a repair-proficient strain and in mei-9,
mei-41, mus-104 and mus-101 strains were 1:
1.2:0.3:0.3:0.7,
despite the fact that w+(TE) reverted two to
three times as frequently as w+R under both the
repair-proficient and repair-deficient genetic conditions. Similarly, after
treatment with MMS, MNNG and ENNG, w+(TE) was
somatically more mutable in the mei-9 strain and less mutable in
the mei-41 and mus-104 strains than in the repair-proficient
strain. From these results, we propose that mutagenic lesions produced in
DNA by treatment with these chemicals are converted to mutant DNA sequences
via the error-prone repair mechanisms dependent on the products of the genes
mei-41+ (mei-41 and mus-104 being alleles
of the same locus) and mus-101+, whereas they are eliminated
by mei-9+-dependent excision repair. In contrast to the
approximately linear responses of induced reversions of w+(
TE) with ENNG in the repair-proficient, mei-9, and
mei-41 strains, seemingly there were dosage insensitive ranges for induced
reversion with MNNG in the repair-proficient and mei-41 strains,
but not for reversion in the mei-9 strain; w+(
TE) in the mus-104 strain was virtually nonmutable with
MNNG and ENNG. These results suggest that O6-methylguanine
(O6MeG) produced in DNA with MNNG, but not O
6-ethylguanine produced with ENNG, is almost completely repaired in
a low dose range by constitutive activity of DNA O6MeG
transmethylase. From the distribution of clone sizes of spontaneous revertant
spots and other data, we propose that both w+(TE) and
w+R have a similar tendency to spontaneously revert
more frequently at early rather than at late developmental stages, probably
reflecting a common property of their inserted transposons.
Accepted on October 31, 1985