- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Charlesworth, B.
- Articles by Langley, C. H.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Charlesworth, B.
- Articles by Langley, C. H.
THE EVOLUTION OF SELF-REGULATED TRANSPOSITION OF TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS
B. Charlesworth 1 and C. H. Langley 2
1 Department of Biology, The University of Chicago, 1103 East
57th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637
2 Laboratory of Genetics, National Institute of Environmental
Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
This paper examines the conditions under which self-regulated rates of transposition can evolve in populations of transposable elements infecting sexually reproducing hosts. Models of the evolution of both cis-acting regulation (transposition immunity) and trans-acting regulation (transposition repression) are analyzed. The potential selective advantage to regulation is assumed to be derived from the deleterious effects of mutations associated with the insertion of newly replicated elements. It is shown that both types of regulation can easily evolve in hosts with low rates of genetic recombination per generation, such as bacteria or bacterial plasmids. Conditions are much more restrictive in organisms with relatively free recombination. In haploids, the main selective force promoting regulation is the induction of lethal or sterile mutations by transposition; in diploids, a sufficiently high frequency of dominant lethal or sterile mutations associated with transpositions is required. Data from Drosophila and maize suggest that this requirement can sometimes be met. Coupling of regulatory effects across different families of elements would also aid the evolution of regulation. The selective advantages of restricting transposition to the germ line and of excising elements from somatic cells are discussed.
Submitted on April 26, 1985Accepted on September 25, 1985
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Murata, N. Kadotani, M. Yamaguchi, Y. Tosa, S. Mayama, and H. Nakayashiki siRNA-dependent and -independent post-transcriptional cosuppression of the LTR-retrotransposon MAGGY in the phytopathogenic fungus Magnaporthe oryzae Nucleic Acids Res., September 25, 2007; 35(18): 5987 - 5994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Rouzic and P. Capy Population Genetics Models of Competition Between Transposable Element Subfamilies Genetics, October 1, 2006; 174(2): 785 - 793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Dolgin and B. Charlesworth The Fate of Transposable Elements in Asexual Populations Genetics, October 1, 2006; 174(2): 817 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Fujimoto, K. Okazaki, E. Fukai, M. Kusaba, and T. Nishio Comparison of the Genome Structure of the Self-Incompatibility (S) Locus in Interspecific Pairs of S Haplotypes Genetics, June 1, 2006; 173(2): 1157 - 1167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. MacKenzie, F. E. Saade, Q. H. Le, T. E. Bureau, and D. J. Schoen Genomic Mutation in Lines of Arabidopsis thaliana Exposed to Ultraviolet-B Radiation Genetics, October 1, 2005; 171(2): 715 - 723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Neafsey, J. P. Blumenstiel, and D. L. Hartl Different Regulatory Mechanisms Underlie Similar Transposable Element Profiles in Pufferfish and Fruitflies Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2004; 21(12): 2310 - 2318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Macroevolution, hierarchy theory, and the C-value enigma Paleobiology, June 1, 2004; 30(2): 179 - 202. |
||||
![]() |
S. I. Wright, N. Agrawal, and T. E. Bureau Effects of Recombination Rate and Gene Density on Transposable Element Distributions in Arabidopsis thaliana Genome Res., August 1, 2003; 13(8): 1897 - 1903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. I. Wright, Q. H. Le, D. J. Schoen, and T. E. Bureau Population Dynamics of an Ac-like Transposable Element in Self- and Cross-Pollinating Arabidopsis Genetics, July 1, 2001; 158(3): 1279 - 1288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Johnson Beneficial Mutations, Hitchhiking and the Evolution of Mutation Rates in Sexual Populations Genetics, April 1, 1999; 151(4): 1621 - 1631. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. V. Nuzhdin, E. G. Pasyukova, E. A. Morozova, and A. J. Flavell Quantitative Genetic Analysis of copia Retrotransposon Activity in Inbred Drosophila melanogaster Lines Genetics, October 1, 1998; 150(2): 755 - 766. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Kidwell and D. Lisch Transposable elements as sources of variation in animals and plants PNAS, July 22, 1997; 94(15): 7704 - 7711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B Charlesworth The evolution of sex chromosomes Science, March 1, 1991; 251(4997): 1030 - 1033. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||






