- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Alleman, M.
- Articles by Freeling, M.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Alleman, M.
- Articles by Freeling, M.
THE Mu TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS OF MAIZE: EVIDENCE FOR TRANSPOSITION AND COPY NUMBER REGULATION DURING DEVELOPMENT
Mary Alleman 1 and Michael Freeling 1
1 Department of Genetics, University of California, Berkeley,
California 94720
The Mu transposon of maize exists in a highly mutagenic strain called Robertson's Mutator. Plants of this strain contain 1050 copies of the Mu element, whereas most maize strains and other plants have none. When Mutator plants are crossed to plants of the inbred line 1S2P, which does not have copies of Mu, the progeny plants have approximately the same number of Mu sequences as did their Mutator parent. Approximately one-half of these copies have segregated from their parent and one-half have arisen by transposition and are integrated into new positions in the genome. This maintenance of copy number can be accounted for by an extremely high rate of transposition of the Mu elements (1015 transpositions per gamete per generation). When Mutator plants are self-pollinated, the progeny double their Mu copy number in the first generation, but maintain a constant number of Mu sequences with subsequent self-pollinations. Transposition of Mu and the events that lead to copy number maintenance occur very late in the development of the germ cells but before fertilization. A larger version of the Mu element transposes but is not necessary for transposition of the Mu sequences. The progeny of crosses with a Mutator plant occasionally lack Mutator activity; these strains retain copies of the Mu element, but these elements no longer transpose.
Submitted on April 12, 1985Accepted on September 23, 1985
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Li, T.-J. Wen, and P. S. Schnable Role of RAD51 in the Repair of MuDR-Induced Double-Strand Breaks in Maize (Zea mays L.) Genetics, January 1, 2008; 178(1): 57 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Woodhouse, M. Freeling, and D. Lisch The mop1 (mediator of paramutation1) Mutant Progressively Reactivates One of the Two Genes Encoded by the MuDR Transposon in Maize Genetics, January 1, 2006; 172(1): 579 - 592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Xu, X. Yan, S. Maurais, H. Fu, D. G. O'Brien, J. Mottinger, and H. K. Dooner Jittery, a Mutator Distant Relative with a Paradoxical Mobile Behavior: Excision without Reinsertion PLANT CELL, May 1, 2004; 16(5): 1105 - 1114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. P. May, H. Liu, E. Vollbrecht, L. Senior, P. D. Rabinowicz, D. Roh, X. Pan, L. Stein, M. Freeling, D. Alexander, et al. Maize-targeted mutagenesis: A knockout resource for maize PNAS, September 30, 2003; 100(20): 11541 - 11546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Chalvet, C. Grimaldi, F. Kaper, T. Langin, and M.-J. Daboussi Hop, an Active Mutator-like Element in the Genome of the Fungus Fusarium oxysporum Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2003; 20(8): 1362 - 1375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Dietrich, F. Cui, M. L. Packila, J. Li, D. A. Ashlock, B. J. Nikolau, and P. S. Schnable Maize Mu Transposons Are Targeted to the 5' Untranslated Region of the gl8 Gene and Sequences Flanking Mu Target-Site Duplications Exhibit Nonrandom Nucleotide Composition Throughout the Genome Genetics, February 1, 2002; 160(2): 697 - 716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. N. Raizada, G.-L. Nan, and V. Walbot Somatic and Germinal Mobility of the RescueMu Transposon in Transgenic Maize PLANT CELL, July 1, 2001; 13(7): 1587 - 1608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Zhang, J. Arbuckle, and S. R. Wessler Recent, extensive, and preferential insertion of members of the miniature inverted-repeat transposable element family Heartbreaker into genic regions of maize PNAS, February 1, 2000; 97(3): 1160 - 1165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. N. Raizada and V. Walbot The Late Developmental Pattern of Mu Transposon Excision Is Conferred by a Cauliflower Mosaic Virus 35S -Driven MURA cDNA in Transgenic Maize PLANT CELL, January 1, 2000; 12(1): 5 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Lisch, L. Girard, M. Donlin, and M. Freeling Functional Analysis of Deletion Derivatives of the Maize Transposon MuDR Delineates Roles for the MURA and MURB Proteins Genetics, January 1, 1999; 151(1): 331 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. de la Luz Gutierrez-Nava, C. A. Warren, P. Leon, and V. Walbot Transcriptionally Active MuDR, the Regulatory Element of the Mutator Transposable Element Family of Zea mays, Is Present in Some Accessions of the Mexican land race Zapalote chico Genetics, May 1, 1998; 149(1): 329 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Martienssen, A Barkan, W C Taylor, and M Freeling Somatically heritable switches in the DNA modification of Mu transposable elements monitored with a suppressible mutant in maize. Genes & Dev., March 1, 1990; 4(3): 331 - 343. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||




