- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Eanes, W. F.
- Articles by Houle, D.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Eanes, W. F.
- Articles by Houle, D.
HOMOZYGOUS AND HEMIZYGOUS VIABILITY VARIATION ON THE X CHROMOSOME OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER
Walter F. Eanes 1, Jody Hey 1, and David Houle 1
1 Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New
York, Stony Brook, New York 11794
We report here a study of viability inbreeding depression associated with the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Fifty wild chromosomes from Mt. Sinai, New York, and 90 wild chromosomes from Death Valley, California, were extracted using the marked FM6 balancer chromosome and viabilities measured for homozygous and heterozygous females, and for hemizygous males, relative to FM6 males as a standard genotype. No statistically significant female genetic load was observed for either chromosome set, although a 95% confidence limit estimated the total load <0.046 for the samples pooled. About 10% of the Death Valley chromosomes appear to be "supervital" as homozygotes. There is little evidence for a pervasive sex-limited detrimental load on the X chromosome; the evidence indicates nearly identical viability effects in males and homozygous females excluding the supervital chromosomes. The average degree of dominance for viability polygenes is estimated between 0.23 to 0.36, which is consistent with autosomal variation and implies near additivity. We conclude that there is little genetic load associated with viability variation on the X chromosome and that the substantial reduction in total fitness observed for chromosome homozygosity in an earlier study may be due largely to sex-limited fertility in females.
Submitted on May 21, 1985Accepted on August 2, 1985
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Fernandez, A. Garcia-Dorado, and A. Caballero The Effect of Antagonistic Pleiotropy on the Estimation of the Average Coefficient of Dominance of Deleterious Mutations Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 2097 - 2112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Fernandez, A. Garcia-Dorado, and A. Caballero Analysis of the Estimators of the Average Coefficient of Dominance of Deleterious Mutations Genetics, October 1, 2004; 168(2): 1053 - 1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Begun and P. Whitley Reduced X-linked nucleotide polymorphism in Drosophila simulans PNAS, May 23, 2000; 97(11): 5960 - 5965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-W. Deng Estimating Within-Locus Nonadditive Coefficient and Discriminating Dominance Versus Overdominance as the Genetic Cause of Heterosis Genetics, April 1, 1998; 148(4): 2003 - 2014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

