- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Lundblad, V.
- Articles by Kleckner, N.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Lundblad, V.
- Articles by Kleckner, N.
MISMATCH REPAIR MUTATIONS OF ESCHERICHIA COLI K12 ENHANCE TRANSPOSON EXCISION
Victoria Lundblad 1 and Nancy Kleckner 2
1 Department of Biochemistry, Harvard University, Cambridge,
Massachusetts 02138
2 Department of Molecular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge,
Massachusetts 02138
Excision of the prokaryotic transposon Tn10 is a host-mediated process that occurs in the absence of recA function or any transposon-encoded functions. To determine which host functions might play a role in transposon excision, we have isolated 40 mutants of E. coli K12, designated tex, which increase the frequency of Tn10 precise excision. Three of these mutations (texA) have been shown to qualitatively alter RecBC function. We show that 21 additional tex mutations with a mutator phenotype map to five genes previously identified as components of a methylation-directed pathway for repair of base pair mismatches: uvrD, mutH, mutL, mutS and dam. Previously identified alleles of these genes also have a Tex phenotype.—Several other E. coli mutations affecting related functions have been analyzed for their effects on Tn10 excision. Other mutations affecting the frequency of spontaneous mutations (mutT, polA, ung), different excision repair pathways ( uvrA, uvrB) or the state of DNA methylation (dcm) have no effect on Tn10 excision. Mutations ssb-113 and mutD5, however, do increase Tn10 excision.—The products of the mismatch correction genes probably function in a coordinated way during DNA repair in vivo. Thus, mutations in these genes might also enhance transposon excision by a single general mechanism. Alternatively, since mutations in each gene have qualitatively and quantitatively different effects on transposon excision, defects in different mismatch repair genes may enhance excision by different mechanisms.
Submitted on June 12, 1984Accepted on August 15, 1984
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  J. Kang and M. J. Blaser UvrD Helicase Suppresses Recombination and DNA Damage-Induced Deletions. J. Bacteriol., August 1, 2006; 188(15): 5450 - 5459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Bzymek and S. T. Lovett Instability of repetitive DNA sequences: The role of replication in multiple mechanisms PNAS, July 17, 2001; 98(15): 8319 - 8325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. G. Godoy and M. S. Fox Transposon stability and a role for conjugational transfer in adaptive mutability PNAS, June 6, 2000; (2000) 130186597. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Reddy and J. Gowrishankar Characterization of the uup Locus and Its Role in Transposon Excisions and Tandem Repeat Deletions in Escherichia coli J. Bacteriol., April 1, 2000; 182(7): 1978 - 1986. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Kuzminov Recombinational Repair of DNA Damage in Escherichia coli and Bacteriophage lambda Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., December 1, 1999; 63(4): 751 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. G. Godoy and M. S. Fox Transposon stability and a role for conjugational transfer in adaptive mutability PNAS, June 20, 2000; 97(13): 7393 - 7398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|