- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Golding, G. B.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Golding, G. B.
THE SAMPLING DISTRIBUTION OF LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM
G. B. Golding 1
1 Laboratory of Genetics, National Institute of Environmental
Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
The probabilities of obtaining particular samples of gametes with two completely linked loci are derived. It is assumed that the population consists of N diploid, randomly mating individuals, that each of the two loci mutate according to the infinite allele model at a rate µ and that the population is at equilibrium. When 4Nµ is small, the most probable samples of gametes are those that segregate only two alleles at either locus. The probabilities of various samples of gametes are discussed. The results show that most samples with completely linked loci have either a very small or a very large association between the alleles of each locus. This causes the distribution of linkage disequilibrium to be skewed and the distribution of the correlation coefficient to be bimodal. The correlation coefficient is commonly used as a test statistic with a chi square distribution and yet has a bimodal distribution when the loci are completely linked. Thus, such a test is not likely to be accurate unless the rate of recombination between the loci and/or the effective population size are sufficiently large enough so that the loci can be treated as unlinked.
Submitted on February 20, 1984Accepted on April 24, 1984
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Mano Random Genetic Drift and Gamete Frequency Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 2043 - 2050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Wall Estimating Recombination Rates Using Three-Site Likelihoods Genetics, July 1, 2004; 167(3): 1461 - 1473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. B. Golding Reconstructing the Prior Probabilities of Allelic Phylogenies Genetics, June 1, 2002; 161(2): 889 - 896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. R. Hudson Two-Locus Sampling Distributions and Their Application Genetics, December 1, 2001; 159(4): 1805 - 1817. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.B. Jorde, W.S. Watkins, and M.J. Bamshad Population genomics: a bridge from evolutionary history to genetic medicine Hum. Mol. Genet., October 1, 2001; 10(20): 2199 - 2207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.B. Jorde Linkage Disequilibrium and the Search for Complex Disease Genes Genome Res., October 1, 2000; 10(10): 1435 - 1444. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. Awadalla and D. Charlesworth Recombination and Selection at Brassica Self-Incompatibility Loci Genetics, May 1, 1999; 152(1): 413 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. N. Grote, W. Klitz, and G. Thomson Constrained Disequilibrium Values and Hitchhiking in a Three-Locus System Genetics, November 1, 1998; 150(3): 1295 - 1307. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||


