- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Gailey, D. A.
- Articles by Siegel, R. W.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Gailey, D. A.
- Articles by Siegel, R. W.
CONDITIONING MUTATIONS IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER AFFECT AN EXPERIENCE-DEPENDENT BEHAVIORAL MODIFICATION IN COURTING MALES
Donald A. Gailey 1, F. Rob Jackson 1, and Richard W. Siegel 1
1 Department of Biology, University of California, Los Angeles,
California 90024
One aspect of courtship in male Drosophila melanogaster has been reported to be experience dependent. Males that have courted fertilized females are virtually unresponsive to virgin females for 23 hr. Here, this response was utilized as an assay for the effects of conditioning mutations on experience-dependent courtship. Seven strains expressing conditioning mutations (previously isolated and characterized for learning or memory defects in an electrical shock-odor association paradigm, independent of courtship) were all found to be mutant in expression of this experience-dependent change in courtship behavior. By comparison, three control strains that were unselected for conditioning defects all expressed normal experience-dependent courtship. Other results indicate that males of the conditioning-defective strains are able to elicit necessary cues from fertilized females, yet do not then modify their courtship with virgin females. Thus, it is suggested that experience-dependent modification of courtship and the previously reported associative olfactory conditioning with electric shock share common elements of processing. The possibility that experience-dependent courtship represents adaptive behavior is discussed.
Submitted on July 21, 1983Accepted on November 28, 1983
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. K. Siwicki, P. Riccio, L. Ladewski, F. Marcillac, L. Dartevelle, S. A. Cross, and J.-F. Ferveur The role of cuticular pheromones in courtship conditioning of Drosophila males Learn. Mem., November 1, 2005; 12(6): 636 - 645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. F. C. Mackay, S. L. Heinsohn, R. F. Lyman, A. J. Moehring, T. J. Morgan, and S. M. Rollmann Genetics and genomics of Drosophila mating behavior PNAS, May 3, 2005; 102(suppl_1): 6622 - 6629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Sakai, T. Tamura, T. Kitamoto, and Y. Kidokoro A clock gene, period, plays a key role in long-term memory formation in Drosophila PNAS, November 9, 2004; 101(45): 16058 - 16063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Zars, M. Fischer, R. Schulz, and M. Heisenberg Localization of a Short-Term Memory in Drosophila Science, April 28, 2000; 288(5466): 672 - 675. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Zars, R. Wolf, R. Davis, and M. Heisenberg Tissue-Specific Expression of a Type I Adenylyl Cyclase Rescues the rutabaga Mutant Memory Defect: In Search of the Engram Learn. Mem., January 1, 2000; 7(1): 18 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M.-l. A. Joiner and L. C. Griffith Visual Input Regulates Circuit Configuration in Courtship Conditioning of Drosophila melanogaster Learn. Mem., January 1, 2000; 7(1): 32 - 42. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
N. G. Kamyshev, K. G. Iliadi, and J. V. Bragina Drosophila Conditioned Courtship: Two Ways of Testing Memory Learn. Mem., January 1, 1999; 6(1): 1 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R M Mihalek, C J Jones, and T Tully The Drosophila mutation turnip has pleiotropic behavioral effects and does not specifically affect learning. Learn. Mem., January 1, 1997; 3(5): 425 - 444. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B van Swinderen and J C Hall Analysis of conditioned courtship in dusky-Andante rhythm mutants of Drosophila. Learn. Mem., January 1, 1995; 2(2): 49 - 61. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||


