- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Baverstock, P. R.
- Articles by Yosida, T. H.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Baverstock, P. R.
- Articles by Yosida, T. H.
GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION AMONG KARYOTYPIC FORMS OF THE BLACK RAT, RATTUS RATTUS
P. R. Baverstock 1, M. Adams 2, L. R. Maxson 2, and T. H. Yosida 3
1 Division of Veterinary Sciences, Department of Agriculture,
Adelaide, South Australia 5000
2 Division of Veterinary Sciences, Department of Agriculture,
Adelaide, South Australia 5000; Departments of Genetics and Development and
Ecology, Ethology and Evolution, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois
61801
3 National Institute of Genetics, Misima, Sizuoka-Ken, 411,
Japan
The black rat, Rattus rattus, consists of five karyotypic
forms2n = 42 (high C-banding); 2n = 42 (low C-banding); 2n = 40; 2n
= 38; 2n = 42 Mauritius. Here, we use isozyme electrophoresis and microcomplement
fixation to elucidate the genetic distance and phylogenetic relationship among
each of the various karyotypic forms of R. rattus and R. norvegicus
. The results show that (1) the 2n = 42 Mauritius black rat (2n = 42Mau)
is genetically very similar to the 2n = 38 form, suggesting that this island
population has undergone very rapid chromosomal evolution; (2) the 2n = 40
form from the highlands of Sri Lanka is genetically distinct from the 2n =
38 form from the lowlands; the genetic difference is probably insufficient,
however, to prevent future introgression; (3) the level of genetic differentiation
occurring between the 2n = 42 forms on the one hand and the 2n = 38, 2n =
40 and 2n = 42 Mau forms on the other support the hybrid incompatability data
in suggesting that the two groups are either full species or incipient species;
(4) in contrast to data from amino acid composition of transferrin and from
restriction endonuclease digests of mtDNA, the present data suggest that the
various karyotypic forms of R. rattus are phylogenetically more closely
related to each other than any is to R. norvegicus, and that they
are related by a series 2n = 42
2n = 40
2n = 38; (5) the
R. rattus/R. norvegicus divergence occurred 28 million years ago,
whereas the various chromosomal forms of R. rattus diverged over
the last 4 million years.
Accepted on July 30, 1983